» Articles » PMID: 30420863

Novel Avenues for Plant Protection: Plant Propagation by Somatic Embryogenesis Enhances Resistance to Insect Feeding

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2018 Nov 14
PMID 30420863
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis (SE), a clonal propagation method utilizing somatic cells, occurs under conditions that activate plant stress adaptation mechanisms such as production of protective secondary metabolites. Surprisingly, possible differences in susceptibility to insect pests between SE-generated and conventionally cultivated plants have not been previously explored. Here, we recorded frequencies and levels of bark-feeding damage by pine weevils () in two large field trials, consisting of emblings (SE-propagated plants) and seedlings from 50 half-sib Norway spruce () families. We found that emblings were less frequently attacked by pine weevils, and when attacked, they were damaged to a lesser extent than seedlings. Moreover, we detected significant additive genetic variation in damage levels received by plants, indicating a heritable component to differences in resistance to insect herbivory among half-sib families. We present first-time evidence that emblings can be more resistant than seedlings to herbivorous insect damage, thus, SE appears to confer a previously unknown plant protection advantage. This finding indicates novel avenues to explore mechanisms underlying plant resistance and new approaches to develop non-toxic measures against insect pests.

Citing Articles

Synergistic effects of methyl jasmonate treatment and propagation method on Norway spruce resistance against a bark-feeding insect.

Berggren K, Nordkvist M, Bjorkman C, Bylund H, Klapwijk M, Puentes A Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1165156.

PMID: 37346130 PMC: 10279954. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1165156.


Variation in Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Defense Among Norway Spruce Clones and Trade-Offs in Resistance Against a Fungal and an Insect Pest.

Puentes A, Zhao T, Lundborg L, Bjorklund N, Borg-Karlson A Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:678959.

PMID: 34108985 PMC: 8182065. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.678959.

References
1.
Mitchell C, Brennan R, Graham J, Karley A . Plant Defense against Herbivorous Pests: Exploiting Resistance and Tolerance Traits for Sustainable Crop Protection. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:1132. PMC: 4965446. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01132. View

2.
Kessler A, Halitschke R, Diezel C, Baldwin I . Priming of plant defense responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisia tridentata and Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia. 2006; 148(2):280-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0365-8. View

3.
Heil M . Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. Trends Plant Sci. 2009; 14(7):356-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.04.002. View

4.
Karban R, Yang L, Edwards K . Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2013; 17(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12205. View

5.
Santos M, Romano E, Vieira L, Baldoni A, Aragao F . Suppression of SERK gene expression affects fungus tolerance and somatic embryogenesis in transgenic lettuce. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2009; 11(1):83-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00103.x. View