» Articles » PMID: 30419993

Use of Geographic Information System Tools to Predict Animal Breed Suitability for Different Agro-ecological Zones

Overview
Journal Animal
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Nov 14
PMID 30419993
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predicting breed-specific environmental suitability has been problematic in livestock production. Native breeds have low productivity but are thought to be more robust to perform under local conditions than exotic breeds. Attempts to introduce genetically improved exotic breeds are generally unsuccessful, mainly due to the antagonistic environmental conditions. Knowledge of the environmental conditions that are shaping the breed would be needed to determine its suitability to different locations. Here, we present a methodology to predict the suitability of breeds for different agro-ecological zones using Geographic Information Systems tools and predictive habitat distribution models. This methodology was tested on the current distribution of two introduced chicken breeds in Ethiopia: the Koekoek, originally from South Africa, and the Fayoumi, originally from Egypt. Cross-validation results show this methodology to be effective in predicting breed suitability for specific environmental conditions. Furthermore, the model predicts suitable areas of the country where the breeds could be introduced. The specific climatic parameters that explained the potential distribution of each of the breeds were similar to the environment from which the breeds originated. This novel methodology finds application in livestock programs, allowing for a more informed decision when designing breeding programs and introduction programs, and increases our understanding of the role of the environment in livestock productivity.

Citing Articles

The risk status, signatures of adaptation, and environmental suitability of village-based indigenous chickens from certain regions of Limpopo and KwaZulu-Natal provinces of South Africa.

Mogano R, Mpofu T, Mtileni B, Hadebe K Front Genet. 2025; 15:1450939.

PMID: 39744066 PMC: 11688331. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1450939.


Whole genome sequencing of three native chicken varieties (Common Deshi, Hilly and Naked Neck) of Bangladesh.

Rabbani M, Vallejo-Trujillo A, Wu Z, Miedzinska K, Faruque S, Watson K Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1432.

PMID: 39719437 PMC: 11668823. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04291-z.


South African indigenous chickens' genetic diversity, and the adoption of ecological niche modelling and landscape genomics as strategic conservation techniques.

Mogano R, Mpofu T, Mtileni B, Hadebe K Poult Sci. 2024; 104(1):104508.

PMID: 39657468 PMC: 11681890. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104508.


Landscape genomics reveals regions associated with adaptive phenotypic and genetic variation in Ethiopian indigenous chickens.

Kebede F, Derks M, Dessie T, Hanotte O, Barros C, Crooijmans R BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):284.

PMID: 38500079 PMC: 10946127. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10193-6.


Genotype by Environment Interactions (G*E) of Chickens Tested in Ethiopia Using Body Weight as a Performance Trait.

de Kinderen M, Solkner J, Meszaros G, Alemu S, Esatu W, Bastiaansen J Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835727 PMC: 10572009. DOI: 10.3390/ani13193121.


References
1.
Solti L, Crichton E, Loskutoff N, Cseh S . Economical and ecological importance of indigenous livestock and the application of assisted reroduction to their preservation. Theriogenology. 2000; 53(1):149-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(99)00248-4. View

2.
Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Musella V, Veneziano V, Maurelli M, Di Pietro F . Geo-referencing livestock farms as tool for studying cystic echinococcosis epidemiology in cattle and water buffaloes from southern Italy. Geospat Health. 2008; 2(1):105-11. DOI: 10.4081/gh.2007.259. View

3.
Kohler-Rollefson I, Rathore H, Mathias E . Local breeds, livelihoods and livestock keepers' rights in South Asia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2008; 41(7):1061-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-008-9271-x. View

4.
Soberon J, Nakamura M . Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106 Suppl 2:19644-50. PMC: 2780935. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901637106. View

5.
Robinson T, Wint G, Conchedda G, Van Boeckel T, Ercoli V, Palamara E . Mapping the global distribution of livestock. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96084. PMC: 4038494. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096084. View