» Articles » PMID: 30417332

Preferences for In-person Disclosure: Patients Declining Telephone Disclosure Characteristics and Outcomes in the Multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone Study

Abstract

Telephone disclosure of cancer genetic test results is noninferior to in-person disclosure. However, how patients who prefer in-person communication of results differ from those who agree to telephone disclosure is unclear but important when considering delivery models for genetic medicine. Patients undergoing cancer genetic testing were recruited to a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial (NCT01736345) comparing telephone to in-person disclosure of genetic test results. We evaluated preferences for in-person disclosure, factors associated with this preference and outcomes compared to those who agreed to randomization. Among 1178 enrolled patients, 208 (18%) declined randomization, largely given a preference for in-person disclosure. These patients were more likely to be older (P = 0.007) and to have had multigene panel testing (P < 0.001). General anxiety (P = 0.007), state anxiety (P = 0.008), depression (P = 0.011), cancer-specific distress (P = 0.021) and uncertainty (P = 0.03) were higher after pretest counseling. After disclosure of results, they also had higher general anxiety (P = 0.003), depression (P = 0.002) and cancer-specific distress (P = 0.043). While telephone disclosure is a reasonable alternative to in-person disclosure in most patients, some patients have a strong preference for in-person communication. Patient age, distress and complexity of testing are important factors to consider and requests for in-person disclosure should be honored when possible.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the multi-ethnic population of the United Arab Emirates on genomic medicine and genetic testing.

Rahma A, Ali B, Patrinos G, Ahmed L, Elbarazi I, Abdullahi A Hum Genomics. 2023; 17(1):63.

PMID: 37454085 PMC: 10349494. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-023-00509-0.


Telehealth in genetic counselling consultations: the impact of COVID-19 in a Portuguese genetic healthcare service.

Dantas M, Da Silva J, Tkachenko N, Paneque M J Community Genet. 2022; 14(1):91-100.

PMID: 36414926 PMC: 9685011. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00618-8.


Experience with a nurse-driven genetic counseling pathway of Italian women with uninformative BRCA test result.

Blondeaux E, Lambertini M, Buzzatti G, Bruzzone C, Baraga M, Pisani R J Genet Couns. 2022; 32(1):140-152.

PMID: 36036895 PMC: 10087002. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1630.


Remote vs in-person BRCA1/2 non-carriers test disclosure: patients' choice during Covid-19 pandemic restriction.

Costanzo S, De Summa S, Maurmo L, Digennaro M, Patruno M, Angelo Paradiso Fam Cancer. 2022; 22(1):43-48.

PMID: 35867288 PMC: 9304797. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-022-00307-y.


Telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk: Patient predictors of differential outcomes.

Binion S, Sorgen L, Peshkin B, Valdimarsdottir H, Isaacs C, Nusbaum R J Telemed Telecare. 2021; 30(2):334-343.

PMID: 34779303 PMC: 9902210. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X211052220.


References
1.
Pieterse A, Van Dulmen A, Beemer F, Bensing J, Ausems M . Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. J Genet Couns. 2007; 16(1):85-96. PMC: 1915655. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9048-1. View

2.
Kinney A, Butler K, Schwartz M, Mandelblatt J, Boucher K, Pappas L . Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(12). PMC: 4334799. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju328. View

3.
Scheuner M, Sieverding P, Shekelle P . Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008; 299(11):1320-34. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1320. View

4.
Burgess K, Carmany E, Trepanier A . A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective. J Genet Couns. 2015; 25(1):112-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9848-2. View

5.
Biesecker B, Boehnke M, Calzone K, Markel D, Garber J, Collins F . Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. JAMA. 1993; 269(15):1970-4. View