» Articles » PMID: 30416627

Evaluation of a Prompt Card for Community Pharmacists Performing Consultations with Patients on Anticoagulation - Lessons Learned

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 13
PMID 30416627
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a prompt card (i.e., a post-card sized tool that lists counselling prompt information) with 5 key elements and 3 open key questions to ask patients in community pharmacies.

Methods: Community pharmacists practicing in England and accredited to perform consultations used the prompt card during a formal consultation with emphasis on patients receiving oral anticoagulation. Main outcome measure was the number of performed consultations with pharmacists' thoughts and feedbacks in writing.

Results: During 8 weeks, 19 pharmacists (mean age: 36.6 (SD=9) years; 7 women; accredited an average of 12.9 (SD=9.8) years) performed 1,034 consultations and used the prompt card 104 times during anticoagulation consultations. Overall the prompt card was judged practical and relevant by the 16 pharmacists who used it (100%), especially because it outlines what a good consultation should comprise. The key elements offered a logical framework to guide the overall approach when undertaking a consultation. The two questions, "Why do you want to use this medicine?" and "Why would you not want to use this medicine?" generated negative responses from the patient and pharmacists, respectively.

Conclusions: Our prompt card with key questions summarizing all the points that should be addressed in a consultation supported effective communication during patient-pharmacist interaction. Two questions need rephrasing and a further question is needed to determine how patients are using their medicines.

Citing Articles

Patient medication counselling in community pharmacy: evaluation of the quality and content.

Showande S, Laniyan M J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022; 15(1):103.

PMID: 36527122 PMC: 9758914. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-022-00502-3.


A naturalistic observation study of medication counseling practices at retail chain pharmacies.

Yande S, Masurkar P, Gopinathan S, Sansgiry S Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020; 18(1):1696.

PMID: 32206141 PMC: 7075423. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1696.

References
1.
Wolters M, van Hulten R, Blom L, Bouvy M . Exploring the concept of patient centred communication for the pharmacy practice. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017; 39(6):1145-1156. PMC: 5694524. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0508-5. View

2.
Ahmad A, Hugtenburg J, Welschen L, Dekker J, Nijpels G . Effect of medication review and cognitive behaviour treatment by community pharmacists of patients discharged from the hospital on drug related problems and compliance: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:133. PMC: 2850341. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-133. View

3.
Linn A, Van Weert J, Schouten B, Smit E, van Bodegraven A, van Dijk L . Words that make pills easier to swallow: a communication typology to address practical and perceptual barriers to medication intake behavior. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012; 6:871-85. PMC: 3526884. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S36195. View

4.
Parker P, Baile W, de Moor C, Lenzi R, Kudelka A, Cohen L . Breaking bad news about cancer: patients' preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(7):2049-56. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.7.2049. View

5.
AlGhurair S, Simpson S, Guirguis L . What elements of the patient-pharmacist relationship are associated with patient satisfaction?. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012; 6:663-76. PMC: 3461603. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S35688. View