» Articles » PMID: 30414527

Computer-aided Detection of Fasciculations and Other Movements in Muscle with Ultrasound: Development and Clinical Application

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2018 Nov 11
PMID 30414527
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop an automated algorithm for detecting fasciculations and other movements in muscle ultrasound videos. Fasciculation detection in muscle ultrasound is routinely performed online by observing the live videos. However, human observation limits the objective information gained. Automated detection of movement is expected to improved sensitivity and specificity and increase reliability.

Methods: We used 42 ultrasound videos from 11 neuromuscular patients for an iterative learning process between human observers and automated computer analysis, to identify muscle ultrasound movements. Two different datasets were selected from this, one to develop the algorithm and one to validate it. The outcome was compared to manual movement identification by clinicians. The algorithm also quantifies specific parameters of different movement types, to enable automated differentiation of events.

Results: The algorithm reliably detected fasciculations. With algorithm guidance, observers found more fasciculations compared to visual analysis alone, and prescreening the videos with the algorithm saved clinicians significant time compared to reviewing full video sequences. All videos also contained other movements, especially contraction pseudotremor, which confused human interpretation in some.

Conclusions: Automated movement detection is a feasible and attractive method to screen for fasciculations in muscle ultrasound videos.

Significance: Our findings affirm the potential clinical usefulness of automated movement analysis in muscle ultrasound.

Citing Articles

Real-time artificial intelligence-based texture analysis of muscle ultrasound data for neuromuscular disorder assessment.

Noda Y, Sekiguchi K, Matoba S, Suehiro H, Nishida K, Matsumoto R Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2024; 9:242-248.

PMID: 39282049 PMC: 11402302. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2024.08.003.


Visual versus quantitative analysis of muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disease.

Wijntjes J, van der Hoeven J, Saris C, Doorduin J, van Alfen N Muscle Nerve. 2022; 66(3):253-261.

PMID: 35765226 PMC: 9545111. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27669.


Using Portable Ultrasound to Monitor the Neuromuscular Reactivity to Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation.

Petras A, Dragoi R, Pupazan V, Dragoi M, Popa D, Neagu A Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33401607 PMC: 7824493. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010065.


Muscle ultrasound: Present state and future opportunities.

Wijntjes J, van Alfen N Muscle Nerve. 2020; 63(4):455-466.

PMID: 33051891 PMC: 8048972. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27081.