» Articles » PMID: 30413213

The Accuracy of Medical Dispatch - a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2018 Nov 11
PMID 30413213
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is a challenge to dispatch Emergency medical Services (EMS) appropriately with limited resources and maintaining patient safety; this requires accurate dispatching systems. The objective of the current systematic review was to examine the evidence, according to GRADE, for medical dispatching systems to accurately dispatch EMS according to level of acuity and in recognition of specific conditions. A systematic search was performed trough PubMed, Web of Science, Embase (free text in all fields), Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 16th of May, 2017. A combination of keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms relevant to "emergency medical dispatch criteria" were used, to search for articles published between 2012 and 2017. Publications were included according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria using the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Level of evidence was evaluated in accordance with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Articles included were those that provided evidence for at least one of the measures of dispatch system accuracy; i.e. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive and/or over- and under-triage. The search identified 1445 articles. After the removal of duplicates, 382 titles were reviewed for relevance and an additional 359 articles were excluded based on manuscript title and abstract. An additional five articles were excluded after review of the full text versions of the remaining articles. The current review included 18 publications which all were based on primary research.

Conclusions: The 18 articles addressed the identification of cardiac arrest, stroke, medical priority and major trauma using different dispatching systems. The results of the current review show that there is a very low to low overall level of evidence for the accuracy of medical dispatching systems. We suggest that it is necessary to create a consensus on common standards for reporting before consensus can be reached for the level of accuracy in medical dispatching systems.

Citing Articles

Navigating care and communication: a qualitative study on nurses' perspectives in response centres.

Anker-Hansen C, Johansen E BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):170.

PMID: 39948604 PMC: 11827251. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02811-9.


Emergency call utilization over a 10-years period: an observational study in Region Zealand, Denmark, 2013-2022.

Moller T, Jensen J, Ersboll A, Blomberg S, Christensen H Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):129.

PMID: 39695689 PMC: 11653862. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01307-w.


Design of an emergency medical information system for mass gatherings.

Tian Y, Shen Z, Zhao Y, Zhou T, Li Q, Zhang M Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39061.

PMID: 39640833 PMC: 11620076. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39061.


Factors affecting emergency medical dispatchers decision making in stroke calls - a qualitative study.

Jamtli B, Svendsen E, Jorgensen T, Kramer-Johansen J, Hov M, Hardeland C BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):214.

PMID: 39548378 PMC: 11566283. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01129-0.


Mobile stroke units services in Germany: A cost-effectiveness modeling perspective on catchment zones, operating modes, and staffing.

Rink J, Szabo K, Hoyer C, Saver J, Nour M, Audebert H Eur J Neurol. 2024; 32(1):e16514.

PMID: 39506352 PMC: 11622509. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16514.


References
1.
Snooks H, Evans A, Wells B, Peconi J, Thomas M, Woollard M . What are the highest priorities for research in emergency prehospital care?. Emerg Med J. 2009; 26(8):549-50. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.065862. View

2.
Clawson J, Scott G, Gardett I, Youngquist S, Taillac P, Fivaz C . Predictive Ability of an Emergency Medical Dispatch Stroke Diagnostic Tool in Identifying Hospital-Confirmed Strokes. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 25(8):2031-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.021. View

3.
Krebes S, Ebinger M, Baumann A, Kellner P, Rozanski M, Doepp F . Development and validation of a dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. Stroke. 2012; 43(3):776-81. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.634980. View

4.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2011; 3(3):e123-30. PMC: 3090117. View