» Articles » PMID: 30411032

Analytical and Quantitative in Vivo Monitoring of Brain Neurochemistry by Electrochemical and Imaging Approaches

Overview
Journal ACS Omega
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2018 Nov 10
PMID 30411032
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantitative monitoring of brain neurochemistry is aimed at an accurate measurement of chemical basal levels and dynamics defining neuronal activities. Analytical tools must be endowed with high selectivity, sensitivity, and spatiotemporal resolution to tackle this task. On one hand, in vivo electroanalysis combined with miniature electrodes has evolved into a minimally invasive method for probing transient events during neural communication and metabolism. On the other hand, noninvasive imaging techniques have been widely adopted in visualizing the neural structure and processes within a population of neurons in two or three dimensions. This perspective will give a concise review of the inspiring frontiers at the interface of neurochemistry and electrochemistry (microvoltammetry, nanoamperometry, galvanic redox potentiometry and ion transport-based sensing) or imaging (super-resolution single nanotube tracking, deep multiphoton microscopy, and free animal imaging). Potential opportunities with these methods and their combinations for multimodal brain analysis will be discussed, intending to draw a brief picture for future neuroscience research.

Citing Articles

Non-Mass Spectrometric Targeted Single-Cell Metabolomics.

Cheng H, Tang Y, Li Z, Guo Z, Heath J, Xue M Trends Analyt Chem. 2023; 168.

PMID: 37840599 PMC: 10569257. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117300.


Accelerating the development of implantable neurochemical biosensors by using existing clinically applied depth electrodes.

Macdonald A, Charlton F, Corrigan D Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022; 415(6):1137-1147.

PMID: 36456747 PMC: 9899734. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04445-1.


Nano- and Microsensors for In Vivo Real-Time Electrochemical Analysis: Present and Future Perspectives.

Vaneev A, Timoshenko R, Gorelkin P, Klyachko N, Korchev Y, Erofeev A Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(21).

PMID: 36364512 PMC: 9656311. DOI: 10.3390/nano12213736.


Design and Evaluation of a Lactate Microbiosensor: Toward Multianalyte Monitoring of Neurometabolic Markers In Vivo in the Brain.

Fernandes E, Ledo A, Barbosa R Molecules. 2022; 27(2).

PMID: 35056837 PMC: 8780383. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020514.

References
1.
Liu T, Chuang M, Chu C, Huang W, Lai H, Wang C . Implantable Graphene-based Neural Electrode Interfaces for Electrophysiology and Neurochemistry in In Vivo Hyperacute Stroke Model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015; 8(1):187-96. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b08327. View

2.
Amatore C, Arbault S, Bonifas I, Guille M, Lemaitre F, Verchier Y . Relationship between amperometric pre-spike feet and secretion granule composition in chromaffin cells: an overview. Biophys Chem. 2007; 129(2-3):181-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2007.05.018. View

3.
Ren L, Mellander L, Keighron J, Cans A, Kurczy M, Svir I . The evidence for open and closed exocytosis as the primary release mechanism. Q Rev Biophys. 2016; 49:e12. DOI: 10.1017/S0033583516000081. View

4.
Rakhilin N, Barth B, Choi J, Munoz N, Kulkarni S, Jones J . Simultaneous optical and electrical in vivo analysis of the enteric nervous system. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11800. PMC: 4899629. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11800. View

5.
Ou Y, Weber S . Higher Aminopeptidase Activity Determined by Electroosmotic Push-Pull Perfusion Contributes to Selective Vulnerability of the Hippocampal CA1 Region to Oxygen Glucose Deprivation. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017; 9(3):535-544. PMC: 5862982. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00326. View