» Articles » PMID: 30407869

Prospective Assessment of the Feasibility of a Trial of Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

Abstract

Rationale: Low-tidal volume ventilation (LTVV; 6 ml/kg) benefits patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and may aid those with other causes of respiratory failure. Current early ventilation practices are poorly defined.

Objectives: We observed patients with acute respiratory failure to assess the feasibility of a pragmatic trial of LTVV and to guide experimental design.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to intensive care units expected to participate in the proposed trial. We collected clinical data as well as information on initial and daily ventilator settings and inpatient mortality. We estimated the benefit of LTVV using predictive linear and nonlinear models. We simulated models to estimate power and feasibility of a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure.

Results: We included 2,484 newly mechanically ventilated patients (31% with acute respiratory distress syndrome) from 49 hospitals. Hospital mortality was 28%. Mean initial tidal volume was 7.1 ml/kg predicted body weight (95% confidence interval, 7.1-7.2), with 78% of patients receiving tidal volumes less than or equal to 8 ml/kg. Our models estimated a mortality benefit of 0-2% from LTVV compared with usual care. Simulation of a stepped-wedged cluster-randomized trial suggested that enrollment of 106,361 patients would be necessary to achieve greater than 90% power.

Conclusions: Use of initial tidal volumes less than 8 ml/kg predicted body weight was common at hospitals participating in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network. After considering the size and budgetary requirement for a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure, the PETAL Network deemed the proposed trial infeasible. A rapid observational study and simulations to model anticipated power may help better design trials.

Citing Articles

Respiratory Therapist-Driven Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Is Associated With Increased Lung Protective Ventilation.

Berg A, Evans E, Okoro U, Pham V, Foley T, Hlas C Respir Care. 2024; 69(9):1071-1080.

PMID: 39013570 PMC: 11349598. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11599.


Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the Mode of Ventilation During Critical Illness (MODE) Trial.

Seitz K, Lloyd B, Wang L, Shotwell M, Qian E, Richardson R CHEST Crit Care. 2024; 2(1).

PMID: 38742219 PMC: 11090486. DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100033.


A Pragmatic Pilot Trial Comparing Patient-Triggered Adaptive Pressure Control to Patient-Triggered Volume Control Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults.

Gibbs K, Forbes J, Harrison K, Krall J, Isenhart A, Taylor S Respir Care. 2023; 68(10):1331-1339.

PMID: 36944477 PMC: 10506635. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10803.


Delivery of Lung-protective Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.

Peltan I, Knighton A, Barney B, Wolfe D, Jacobs J, Klippel C Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022; 20(3):424-432.

PMID: 36350983 PMC: 9993149. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202207-626OC.


Titration of Ventilator Settings to Target Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power.

Baedorf Kassis E, Baedorf Kassis E, Hu S, Lu M, Johnson A, Johnson A Respir Care. 2022; 68(2):199-207.

PMID: 35868844 PMC: 9994280. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10258.


References
1.
Kalhan R, Mikkelsen M, Dedhiya P, Christie J, Gaughan C, Lanken P . Underuse of lung protective ventilation: analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(2):300-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000198328.83571.4a. View

2.
Minelli C, Baio G . Value of Information: A Tool to Improve Research Prioritization and Reduce Waste. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(9):e1001882. PMC: 4587808. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001882. View

3.
Brower R, Matthay M, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson B, Wheeler A . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18):1301-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. View

4.
Fuller B, Ferguson I, Mohr N, Drewry A, Palmer C, Wessman B . Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 70(3):406-418.e4. PMC: 5573637. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.013. View

5.
Bellani G, Laffey J, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A . Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016; 315(8):788-800. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. View