» Articles » PMID: 30404514

Cortical Markers of Auditory Stream Segregation Revealed for Streaming Based on Tonotopy but Not Pitch

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2018 Nov 9
PMID 30404514
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The brain decomposes mixtures of sounds, such as competing talkers, into perceptual streams that can be attended to individually. Attention can enhance the cortical representation of streams, but it is unknown what acoustic features the enhancement reflects, or where in the auditory pathways attentional enhancement is first observed. Here, behavioral measures of streaming were combined with simultaneous low- and high-frequency envelope-following responses (EFR) that are thought to originate primarily from cortical and subcortical regions, respectively. Repeating triplets of harmonic complex tones were presented with alternating fundamental frequencies. The tones were filtered to contain either low-numbered spectrally resolved harmonics, or only high-numbered unresolved harmonics. The behavioral results confirmed that segregation can be based on either tonotopic or pitch cues. The EFR results revealed no effects of streaming or attention on subcortical responses. Cortical responses revealed attentional enhancement under conditions of streaming, but only when tonotopic cues were available, not when streaming was based only on pitch cues. The results suggest that the attentional modulation of phase-locked responses is dominated by tonotopically tuned cortical neurons that are insensitive to pitch or periodicity cues.

Citing Articles

Listening to Contemporary Art Music: A Morphodynamic Model of Cognition.

Wanke R J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):32.

PMID: 37426057 PMC: 10327862. DOI: 10.5334/joc.280.


No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.

Madsen S, Dau T, Oxenham A PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249654.

PMID: 33826663 PMC: 8026035. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249654.


No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Beim J, Oxenham A, Wojtczak M J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 146(2):1475.

PMID: 31472524 PMC: 6715442. DOI: 10.1121/1.5123391.

References
1.
Moerel M, De Martino F, Formisano E . Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(41):14205-16. PMC: 6622378. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1388-12.2012. View

2.
Fishman Y, Micheyl C, Steinschneider M . Neural representation of harmonic complex tones in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(25):10312-23. PMC: 3685833. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0020-13.2013. View

3.
Cusack R . The intraparietal sulcus and perceptual organization. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(4):641-51. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053467541. View

4.
Allen E, Burton P, Olman C, Oxenham A . Representations of Pitch and Timbre Variation in Human Auditory Cortex. J Neurosci. 2016; 37(5):1284-1293. PMC: 5296797. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2336-16.2016. View

5.
Galbraith G, Bhuta S, Choate A, Kitahara J, Mullen Jr T . Brain stem frequency-following response to dichotic vowels during attention. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(8):1889-93. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00041. View