» Articles » PMID: 30399479

Left-shifting Prism Adaptation Boosts Reward-based Learning

Overview
Journal Cortex
Date 2018 Nov 7
PMID 30399479
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visuospatial cognition has an inherent lateralized bias. Individual differences in the direction and magnitude of this bias are associated with asymmetrical D2/3 dopamine binding and dopamine system genotypes. Dopamine level affects feedback-based learning and dopamine signaling asymmetry is related to differential learning from reward and punishment. High D2 binding in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for reward. Prism adaptation (PA) is a simple sensorimotor technique, which modulates visuospatial bias according to the direction of the deviation. Left-deviating prism adaptation (LPA) induces rightward bias in healthy subjects. It is therefore possible that the right side of space increases in saliency along with left hemisphere dopaminergic activity. Right-deviating prism adaptation (RPA) has been used mainly as a control condition because it does not modulate behavior in healthy individuals. Since LPA induces a rightward visuospatial bias as a result of left hemisphere modulation, and higher dopaminergic activity in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for rewarding events we hypothesized that LPA would increase the preference for learning with reward. Healthy volunteers performed a computer-based probabilistic classification task before and after LPA or RPA. Consistent with our predictions, PA altered the preference for rewarded versus punished learning, with the LPA group exhibiting increased learning from reward. These results suggest that PA modulates dopaminergic activity in a lateralized fashion.

Citing Articles

Modulation of memory by prism adaptation in healthy subjects.

Turriziani P, Campo F, Bonaventura R, Mangano G, Oliveri M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25358.

PMID: 39455697 PMC: 11511821. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77027-z.


The effects of prior exposure to prism lenses on de novo motor skill learning.

Lang-Hodge A, Cooke D, Marigold D PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292518.

PMID: 37862342 PMC: 10588867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292518.


Right-deviating prismatic adaptation reduces obsessions in a community sample.

Magnani B, Frassinetti F, Franceschini C, Dimaggio G, Musetti A Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1025379.

PMID: 36619054 PMC: 9811126. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025379.


Editorial: Uncovering the neural correlates of prism adaptation: Evidence from the brain network approach.

Panico F, Schintu S, Trojano L Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1076307.

PMID: 36457912 PMC: 9706180. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1076307.


Effective connectivity underlying neural and behavioral components of prism adaptation.

Schintu S, Gotts S, Freedberg M, Shomstein S, Wassermann E Front Psychol. 2022; 13:915260.

PMID: 36118425 PMC: 9479732. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915260.


References
1.
Zimmerberg B, Glick S, Jerussi T . Neurochemical correlate of a spatial preference in rats. Science. 1974; 185(4151):623-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4151.623. View

2.
Jewell G, McCourt M . Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(1):93-110. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00045-7. View

3.
. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20):2191-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. View

4.
Slagter H, Davidson R, Tomer R . Eye-blink rate predicts individual differences in pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 48(5):1265-8. PMC: 2843752. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.027. View

5.
Luaute J, Schwartz S, Rossetti Y, Spiridon M, Rode G, Boisson D . Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(1):169-78. PMC: 6664918. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3054-08.2009. View