Parent, Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Outcomes During and Following Neonatal Care: a Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

Overview

Journal BMJ Paediatr Open

Publisher BMJ Publishing Group

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2018 Nov 7

PMID 30397672

Citations 16

Authors

James Webbe

Ginny Brunton

Shohaib Ali

Nicholas Longford

Neena Modi

Chris Gale

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Multiple outcomes can be measured in infants that receive neonatal care. It is unknown whether outcomes of importance to parents and patients differ from those of health professionals. Our objective was to systematically map neonatal care outcomes discussed in qualitative research by patients, parents and healthcare professionals and test whether the frequency with which outcomes are discussed differs between groups.

Design: Systematic review of qualitative literature. The following databases were searched: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ASSIA from 1997 to 2017. Publications describing qualitative data relating to neonatal care outcomes, reported by former patients, parents or healthcare professionals, were included. Narrative text was analysed and outcomes grouped thematically by organ system. Permutation testing was applied to assess an association between the outcomes identified and stakeholder group.

Results: Sixty-two papers containing the views of over 4100 stakeholders were identified; 146 discrete outcomes were discussed; 58 outcomes related to organ systems and 88 to other more global domains. Permutation testing provides evidence that parents, former patients and health professionals reported outcomes with different frequencies (p=0.037).

Conclusions: Parents, patients and health professionals focus on different outcomes when discussing their experience of neonatal care. A wide range of neonatal care outcomes are reported in qualitative research; many are global outcomes relating to the overall status of the infant. The views of former patients and parents should be taken into consideration when designing research; the development of a core outcomes set for neonatal research will facilitate this.

Citing Articles

Associations among positive child health measures in the environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) cohort.

Taylor G, Burjak M, Ray D, Blackwell C, Santos H, Ganiban J Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39904821 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03900-7.

Prophylactic low-dose hydrocortisone in neonates born extremely preterm: current knowledge and future challenges.

Baud O, Torchin H, Butin M, Flamant C, Nuytten A Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39592771 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03756-6.

Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants.

de Boer A, van Beek P, Andriessen P, Groenendaal F, Hogeveen M, Meijer J Children (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892375 PMC: 10605480. DOI: 10.3390/children10101712.

Parental Experiences of Neonatal Care: A Nationwide Study on Determinants of Excellence.

Linner A, Blomqvist Y, Jonsson K, Lillieskold S, Norman M Neonatology. 2023; 121(1):46-55.

PMID: 37844545 PMC: 10836739. DOI: 10.1159/000533900.

School-age outcomes of children after perinatal brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rees P, Callan C, Chadda K, Vaal M, Diviney J, Sabti S BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023; 7(1).

PMID: 37270200 PMC: 10255042. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001810.

References

Lou H, Pedersen B, Hedegaard M . Questions never asked. Positive family outcomes of extremely premature childbirth. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(5):567-73. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9480-4. View

Webbe J, Brunton G, Ali S, Duffy J, Modi N, Gale C . Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018; 1(1):e000048. PMC: 5862188. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000048. View

Hefferman P, Heilig S . Giving "moral distress" a voice: ethical concerns among neonatal intensive care unit personnel. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999; 8(2):173-8. DOI: 10.1017/s0963180199802060. View

Arruda D, Marcon S . [Family experience of dealing with sequels of the prematurity of a child]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2010; 63(4):595-602. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-71672010000400015. View

Boyle E, Poulsen G, Field D, Kurinczuk J, Wolke D, Alfirevic Z . Effects of gestational age at birth on health outcomes at 3 and 5 years of age: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e896. PMC: 3291750. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e896. View

Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View

Docherty S, Lowry C, Miles M . Poverty as context for the parenting experience of low-income Lumbee Indian mothers with a medically fragile infant. Neonatal Netw. 2007; 26(6):361-9. DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.26.6.361. View

Chang K, Austin A, Yeaman J, Phillips L, Kratz A, Yang L . Health-Related Quality of Life Components in Children With Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy: A Qualitative Study. PM R. 2016; 9(4):383-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.002. View

Janvier A, Farlow B, Baardsnes J, Pearce R, Barrington K . Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: A family perspective. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40(8):571-577. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.009. View

10.

Ludbrook J . Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1994; 21(9):673-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1994.tb02570.x. View

11.

Saigal S, Day K, Van Lieshout R, Schmidt L, Morrison K, Boyle M . Health, Wealth, Social Integration, and Sexuality of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Prematurely Born Adults in the Fourth Decade of Life. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170(7):678-86. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0289. View

12.

Kavanaugh K . Parents' experience surrounding the death of a newborn whose birth is at the margin of viability. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997; 26(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1997.tb01506.x. View

13.

Sofaer S . Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34(5 Pt 2):1101-18. PMC: 1089055. View

14.

Carpenter W, Meyer A, Abernethy A, Sturmer T, Kosorok M . A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(11):1150-8. PMC: 3461183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.005. View

15.

Votteler T, Lipsky K . Long-term results of 10 conjoined twin separations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(4):618-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.12.011. View

16.

Roberts G, Cheong J . Long-term growth and general health for the tiniest or most immature infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 19(2):118-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.003. View

17.

Williamson P, Altman D, Bagley H, Barnes K, Blazeby J, Brookes S . The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017; 18(Suppl 3):280. PMC: 5499094. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4. View

18.

Squitieri L, Larson B, Chang K, Yang L, Chung K . Understanding quality of life and patient expectations among adolescents with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a qualitative and quantitative pilot study. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 38(12):2387-2397.e2. PMC: 4158435. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.09.006. View

19.

Gardner W, Kelleher K . Core Quality and Outcome Measures for Pediatric Health. JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171(9):827-828. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1685. View

20.

Reyna B, Pickler R, Thompson A . A descriptive study of mothers' experiences feeding their preterm infants after discharge. Adv Neonatal Care. 2007; 6(6):333-40. PMC: 3646381. DOI: 10.1016/j.adnc.2006.08.007. View