» Articles » PMID: 30395315

Cultural Influences on the Processing of Social Comparison Feedback Signals-an ERP Study

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 6
PMID 30395315
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated cultural differences regarding social connectedness in association with social vs non-social comparison feedback. We performed electroencephalography in 54 Chinese and 49 Western adults while they performed a time estimation task in which response-accuracy feedback was either delivered pertaining to participants' own performance (non-social reference frame) or to the performance of a reference group (social reference frame). Trait interdependence and independence were assessed using a cultural orientations questionnaire. Applying a principal component approach, we observed divergent effects for the two cultural groups during feedback processing. In particular, Feedback-Related Negativity results indicated that non-social (vs social) reference feedback was more salient/motivating for Chinese participants, while Westerners showed the opposite pattern. The results suggest that Chinese individuals perceive a non-social context as more salient than a social comparison context, possibly due to their extensive experience of social comparisons in daily life. The reverse pattern was found in Western participants, for whom a social comparison context is less common and presumably more salient. The cultural differences in neural responses to social vs non-social feedback might be caused by culturally diverse cognitive traits, as well as by exposure to culturally defined behaviour on a systemic level-such as the education system.

Citing Articles

The impact of social hierarchies on neural response to feedback evaluations after advice giving.

Li J, Li M, Sun Y, Zhang G, Fan W, Zhong Y Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(2):e26611.

PMID: 38339957 PMC: 10839742. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26611.


Psychometric Validation of the Persian Self-Compassion Scale Youth Version.

Nazari N, Hernandez R, Ocana-Fernandez Y, Griffiths M Mindfulness (N Y). 2022; 13(2):385-397.

PMID: 35018198 PMC: 8736317. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-021-01801-7.


Validation of the Chinese Version of Relaxation Sensitivity Index: A Tool for Predicting Treatment Effect in Mindfulness Interventions.

Zhang J, Luberto C, Huang Q, Kuang J, Zhong J, Yeung A Front Public Health. 2022; 9:809572.

PMID: 34988059 PMC: 8720785. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809572.


Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.

Hu X, Mai X Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021; 16(7):670-682.

PMID: 33769539 PMC: 8259273. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab032.


"No Pain No Gain": Evidence from a Parcel-Wise Brain Morphometry Study on the Volitional Quality of Elite Athletes.

Wei G, Si R, Li Y, Yao Y, Chen L, Zhang S Brain Sci. 2020; 10(7).

PMID: 32709011 PMC: 7407584. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10070459.


References
1.
Hajcak G, Moser J, Holroyd C, Simons R . The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol. 2005; 71(2):148-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001. View

2.
Leng Y, Zhou X . Modulation of the brain activity in outcome evaluation by interpersonal relationship: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 48(2):448-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.002. View

3.
Hedden T, Ketay S, Aron A, Markus H, Gabrieli J . Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(1):12-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02038.x. View

4.
Dien J . Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Psychophysiology. 2009; 47(1):170-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00885.x. View

5.
Bellebaum C, Daum I . Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. Eur J Neurosci. 2008; 27(7):1823-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06138.x. View