» Articles » PMID: 30386368

Number Needed to Diagnose, Predict, or Misdiagnose: Useful Metrics for Non-Canonical Signs of Cognitive Status?

Overview
Publisher Karger
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2018 Nov 3
PMID 30386368
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: "Number needed to" metrics may hold more intuitive appeal for clinicians than standard diagnostic accuracy measures. The aim of this study was to calculate "number needed to diagnose" (NND), "number needed to predict" (NNP), and "number needed to misdiagnose" (NNM) for neurological signs of possible value in assessing cognitive status.

Methods: Data sets from pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies examining easily observed and dichotomised neurological signs ("attended alone" sign, "attended with" sign, head turning sign, applause sign, ) were analysed to calculate the NND, NNP, and NNM.

Results: All measures of discrimination showed broad ranges. The range of NND and NNP suggested that these signs were, with a single exception, of value for correctly diagnosing or predicting cognitive status (presence or absence of cognitive impairment) when between 2 and 4 patients were examined. However, NNM showed similar values (range 1-5 patients) suggesting risk of misdiagnosis.

Conclusion: NND, NNP, and NNM may be useful, intuitive, metrics in assessing the utility of diagnostic tests in day-to-day clinical practice. A ratio of NNM to either NND or NNP, termed the likelihood to diagnose or misdiagnose, may clarify the utility or inutility of diagnostic tests.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic tests performance indices: an overview.

Habibzadeh F Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2025; 35(1):010101.

PMID: 39974192 PMC: 11838712. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2025.010101.


Prediction of Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Outcome: Comparative Accuracy of 27 Immune-Inflammatory-Metabolic Markers and Related Conceptual Issues.

Fisher A, Fisher L, Srikusalanukul W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999533 PMC: 11242639. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133969.


Evaluating the performance of a risk assessment score tool to predict HIV acquisition among pregnant and postpartum women in Kenya.

Chhun N, Rothschild C, Penumetsa M, Matemo D, Kithao P, Richardson B PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306992.

PMID: 38985777 PMC: 11236202. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306992.


The Price of Explainability in Machine Learning Models for 100-Day Readmission Prediction in Heart Failure: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.

Soliman A, Agvall B, Etminani K, Hamed O, Lingman M J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e46934.

PMID: 37889530 PMC: 10638630. DOI: 10.2196/46934.


Patterns of risk-Using machine learning and structural neuroimaging to identify pedophilic offenders.

Popovic D, Wertz M, Geisler C, Kaufmann J, Lahteenvuo M, Lieslehto J Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1001085.

PMID: 37151966 PMC: 10157073. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1001085.


References
1.
Bossuyt P, Reitsma J, Bruns D, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L . The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(1):7-18. DOI: 10.1373/49.1.7. View

2.
Youden W . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950; 3(1):32-5. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3. View

3.
Linn S, Grunau P . New patient-oriented summary measure of net total gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2006; 3:11. PMC: 1635036. DOI: 10.1186/1742-5573-3-11. View

4.
Larner A . Head turning sign: pragmatic utility in clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012; 83(8):852-3. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301804. View

5.
Larner A . Screening utility of the "attended alone" sign for subjective memory impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012; 28(4):364-5. DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182769b4f. View