» Articles » PMID: 30384968

Two Mechanisms Underlying Auditory Dominance: Overshadowing and Response Competition

Overview
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2018 Nov 3
PMID 30384968
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are occasions when infants and children have difficulty in processing arbitrary auditory-visual pairings, with auditory input sometimes attenuating visual processing (i.e., auditory dominance). The current research examined possible mechanisms underlying these auditory dominance effects in infants and 4-year-olds. Do auditory dominance effects stem from auditory input attenuating encoding of visual input, from the difficulty of inhibiting auditory-based responses, or from a combination of these factors? In five reported experiments, 4-year-olds (Experiments 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) and 14- and 22-month-olds (Experiment 3) were presented with a variety of tasks that required simultaneous processing of auditory and visual input, and then we assessed memory for the visual items at test. Auditory dominance in young children resulted from response competition that children could not resolve. Infants' results were not as robust, but they provided some evidence that nonlinguistic sounds and possibly spoken words may attenuate encoding of visual input. The current findings shed light on mechanisms underlying cross-modal processing and auditory dominance and have implications for many tasks that hinge on the processing of arbitrary auditory-visual pairings.

Citing Articles

The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.

Sun X, Fu Q J Intell. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38132836 PMC: 10744040. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11120218.


Attentional focusing and filtering in multisensory categorization.

Li J, Deng S Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(2):708-720.

PMID: 37673842 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02370-7.


Speech Reception in Young Children with Autism Is Selectively Indexed by a Neural Oscillation Coupling Anomaly.

Wang X, Delgado J, Marchesotti S, Kojovic N, Sperdin H, Rihs T J Neurosci. 2023; 43(40):6779-6795.

PMID: 37607822 PMC: 10552944. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0112-22.2023.


Facilitation and interference effects of the multisensory context on learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li J, Deng S Psychol Res. 2022; 87(5):1334-1352.

PMID: 36107248 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01733-4.


Listen to Your Heart: Examining Modality Dominance Using Cross-Modal Oddball Tasks.

Robinson C, Chadwick K, Parker J, Sinnett S Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1643.

PMID: 32849007 PMC: 7399371. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01643.


References
1.
Fenson L, Dale P, Reznick J, Bates E, Thal D, Pethick S . Variability in early communicative development. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994; 59(5):1-173; discussion 174-85. View

2.
Schafer G, Plunkett K . Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Dev. 1998; 69(2):309-20. View

3.
Barnhart W, Rivera S, Robinson C . Different patterns of modality dominance across development. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017; 182:154-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.017. View

4.
DeSimone R, Duncan J . Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995; 18:193-222. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205. View

5.
Massaro D . Children's perception of visual and auditory speech. Child Dev. 1984; 55(5):1777-88. View