» Articles » PMID: 30379569

Marker-based Watershed Transform Method for Fully Automatic Mandibular Segmentation from CBCT Images

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 1
PMID 30379569
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives:: To propose a reliable and practical method for automatically segmenting the mandible from CBCT images.

Methods:: The marker-based watershed transform is a region-growing approach that dilates or "floods" predefined markers onto a height map whose ridges denote object boundaries. We applied this method to segment the mandible from the rest of the CBCT image. The height map was generated to enhance the sharp decreases of intensity at the mandible/tissue border and suppress noise by computing the intensity gradient image of the CBCT itself. Two sets of markers, "mandible" and "background" were automatically placed inside and outside the mandible, respectively in a novel image using image registration. The watershed transform flooded the gradient image by dilating the markers simultaneously until colliding at watershed lines, estimating the mandible boundary. CBCT images of 20 adolescent subjects were chosen as test cases. Segmentation accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by measuring overlap (Dice similarity coefficient) and boundary agreement against a well-accepted interactive segmentation method described in the literature.

Results:: The Dice similarity coefficient was 0.97 ± 0.01 (mean ± SD), indicating almost complete overlap between the automatically and the interactively segmented mandibles. Boundary deviations were predominantly under 1 mm for most of the mandibular surfaces. The errors were mostly from bones around partially erupted wisdom teeth, the condyles and the dental enamels, which had minimal impact on the overall morphology of the mandible.

Conclusions:: The marker-based watershed transform method produces segmentation accuracy comparable to the well-accepted interactive segmentation approach.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms Regarding Temporomandibular Joint Related Diseases.

Ozsari S, Guzel M, Yilmaz D, Kamburoglu K Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627959 PMC: 10453523. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162700.


Whole mandibular canal segmentation using transformed dental CBCT volume in Frenet frame.

Zhao H, Chen J, Yun Z, Feng Q, Zhong L, Yang W Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17651.

PMID: 37449128 PMC: 10336514. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17651.


Digital chain for pelvic tumor resection with 3D-printed surgical cutting guides.

Biscaccianti V, Fragnaud H, Hascoet J, Crenn V, Vidal L Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:991676.

PMID: 36159695 PMC: 9493251. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.991676.


Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region.

van Leeuwen B, Dijkstra P, Dieters J, Verbeek H, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, Ren Y Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(9):5663-5672.

PMID: 35513582 PMC: 9474376. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04521-x.


Accuracy of advanced deep learning with tensorflow and keras for classifying teeth developmental stages in digital panoramic imaging.

Mohammad N, Muad A, Ahmad R, Mohd Yusof M BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):66.

PMID: 35395737 PMC: 8991580. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00794-6.


References
1.
Hu S, Hoffman E, Reinhardt J . Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(6):490-8. DOI: 10.1109/42.929615. View

2.
Kiraly A, Higgins W, McLennan G, Hoffman E, Reinhardt J . Three-dimensional human airway segmentation methods for clinical virtual bronchoscopy. Acad Radiol. 2002; 9(10):1153-68. DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80517-2. View

3.
Beare R . A locally constrained watershed transform. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2006; 28(7):1063-74. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.132. View

4.
Yan J, Zhao B, Wang L, Zelenetz A, Schwartz L . Marker-controlled watershed for lymphoma segmentation in sequential CT images. Med Phys. 2006; 33(7):2452-60. DOI: 10.1118/1.2207133. View

5.
Gomez W, Leija L, Alvarenga A, Infantosi A, Pereira W . Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation. Med Phys. 2010; 37(1):82-95. DOI: 10.1118/1.3265959. View