» Articles » PMID: 30378688

Cell-specific Retention and Action of Pheophorbide-based Photosensitizers in Human Lung Cancer Cells

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 1
PMID 30378688
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study determined in primary cultures of human lung cancer cells the cell specificity of chlorin-based photosensitizers. Epithelial cells (ECs) preferentially retained 3-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinylpyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) and related structural variants. Tumor-associated fibroblasts (Fb) differ from EC by a higher efflux rate of HPPH. Immunoblot analyses indicated dimerization of STAT3 as a reliable biomarker of the photoreaction. Compared to mitochondria/ER-localized photoreaction by HPPH, the photoreaction by lysosomally targeted HPPH-lactose showed a trend toward lower STAT3 cross-linking. Lethal consequence of the photoreaction differed between EC and Fb with the latter cells being more resistant. A survey of lung tumor cases indicated a large quantitative range by which EC retains HPPH. The specificity of HPPH retention defined in vitro could be confirmed in vivo in selected cases grown as xenografts. HPPH retention as a function of the tetrapyrrole structure was evaluated by altering side groups on the porphyrin macrocycle. The presence or absence of a carboxylic acid at position 17 proved to be critical. A benzyl group at position 20 enhanced retention in a subset of cancer cells with low HPPH binding. This study indicated experimental tools that are potentially effective in defining the photosensitizer preference and application for individual patient's cancer lesions.

Citing Articles

Excitation of a Single Compound by Light and Ultrasound Enhanced the Long-Term Cure of Mice Bearing Prostate Tumors.

Cacaccio J, Durrani F, Kumar I, Dukh M, Camacho S, Fayazi Z Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(13).

PMID: 37445799 PMC: 10341536. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310624.


Impact of mono- and di-β-galactose moieties in / anticancer efficacy of pyropheophorbide-carbohydrate conjugates by photodynamic therapy.

Dukh M, Cacaccio J, Durrani F, Kumar I, Watson R, Tabaczynski W Eur J Med Chem Rep. 2022; 5.

PMID: 36568335 PMC: 9776133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmcr.2022.100047.


Tumor Cell-Specific Retention and Photodynamic Action of Erlotinib-Pyropheophorbide Conjugates.

Tracy E, Cheruku R, Pandey R, Baumann H Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(19).

PMID: 36232384 PMC: 9569946. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911081.


Charged groups on pyropheophorbide-based photosensitizers dictate uptake by tumor cells and photodynamic therapy efficacy.

Saenz C, Ethirajan M, Tracy E, Bowman M, Cacaccio J, Ohulchanskyy T J Photochem Photobiol B. 2021; 227:112375.

PMID: 34968800 PMC: 8816894. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112375.


Codelivery of Anticancer Drug and Photosensitizer by PEGylated Graphene Oxide and Cell Penetrating Peptide Enhanced Tumor-Suppressing Effect on Osteosarcoma.

Zhang Y, Wu Y, Lan T, Chen Y, Su S Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 7:618896.

PMID: 33898510 PMC: 8060914. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.618896.


References
1.
Srivatsan A, Pera P, Joshi P, Wang Y, Missert J, Tracy E . Effect of chirality on cellular uptake, imaging and photodynamic therapy of photosensitizers derived from chlorophyll-a. Bioorg Med Chem. 2015; 23(13):3603-17. PMC: 4461543. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.04.006. View

2.
Bellnier D, Greco W, Loewen G, Nava H, Oseroff A, Pandey R . Population pharmacokinetics of the photodynamic therapy agent 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a in cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(8):1806-13. View

3.
Breitfeld P, Simmons Jr C, Strous G, Geuze H, Schwartz A . Cell biology of the asialoglycoprotein receptor system: a model of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1985; 97:47-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62348-7. View

4.
Kuimova M, Yahioglu G, Ogilby P . Singlet oxygen in a cell: spatially dependent lifetimes and quenching rate constants. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(1):332-40. DOI: 10.1021/ja807484b. View

5.
Bronshtein I, Afri M, Weitman H, Frimer A, Smith K, Ehrenberg B . Porphyrin depth in lipid bilayers as determined by iodide and parallax fluorescence quenching methods and its effect on photosensitizing efficiency. Biophys J. 2004; 87(2):1155-64. PMC: 1304454. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.041434. View