Comparison of Collum Femoris-preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview

Journal J Orthop Surg Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2018 Oct 31

PMID 30373613

Citations 5

Authors

MingQing Li

Can Xu

Jie Xie

Yihe Hu

Hua Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study investigated the relative benefits of using a collum femoris-preserving prosthesis or ribbed stem during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: The clinical results were compared of patients who underwent THA, between January 2010 and December 2012, with either a CFP prosthesis or a ribbed stem (66 and 75 patients, respectively, aged 43.4 ± 10.8 and 42.3 ± 9.8 years). Patients were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and physical component summary (PCS) score. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and leg-length differences were noted.

Results: The mean follow-up times of the CFP and ribbed groups were 67.2 ± 7.5 and 68.3 ± 7.2 months, respectively. The HHS, SF-12 MCS, SF-12 PCS, and WOMAC scores of the two groups were similar. The rates of periprosthetic femoral fractures and leg-length differences > 10 mm in the CFP group (10.6% and 13.6%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the ribbed group (1.3% and 2.7%). The groups were similar regarding complications of osteolysis, ectopic ossification, dislocation, deep infection, deep venous thrombosis, thigh pain, and aseptic loosening. The survival rates of the CFP and ribbed groups were comparable (98.5% and 97.8%).

Conclusion: The clinical results of the CFP and ribbed prostheses in young patients given THA were similar for Chinese patients. However, the CFP stem should be used with caution, given the high incidence of technical problems associated with implantation especially for Chinese patients.

Citing Articles

Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Yao M, Wang Y, Wei C, Han Y, Li H J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(5):300060520925999.

PMID: 32459103 PMC: 7273761. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520925999.

Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Liu Z, Liu B, Liu S, Li M, Chen X, Han Y Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e924668.

PMID: 32413021 PMC: 7245061. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924668.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Hu H, Liu Z, Liu B, Ding X, Liu S, Wu T Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e921847.

PMID: 32001666 PMC: 7006600. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.921847.

[Mid- and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis in 354 cases].

Yang T, Xie J, Hu Y, An S, Wang L Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(9):1116-1120.

PMID: 31512452 PMC: 8355845. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901124.

Relationships between the femoral neck-preserving ratio and radiologic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty with a collum femoris-preserving stem.

Liu Z, Hu H, Liu S, Huo J, Li M, Han Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(35):e16926.

PMID: 31464929 PMC: 6736090. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016926.

References

Gruen T, McNeice G, Amstutz H . "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (141):17-27. View

Van Oldenrijk J, Schafroth M, Rijk E, Runne W, Verheyen C, van Egmond C . Learning curve analysis of the Collum Femoris Preserving total hip surgical technique. Hip Int. 2013; 23(2):154-61. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000013. View

Whitehouse M, Stefanovich-Lawbuary N, Brunton L, Blom A . The impact of leg length discrepancy on patient satisfaction and functional outcome following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8):1408-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.009. View

Capello W, DAntonio J, Naughton M . Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: a new fracture pattern is described. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 472(2):604-10. PMC: 3890210. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3137-x. View

Kress A, Schmidt R, Nowak T, Nowak M, Haeberle L, Forst R . Stress-related femoral cortical and cancellous bone density loss after collum femoris preserving uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective 7-year follow-up with quantitative computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(8):1111-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1537-0. View

Schaller G, Black J, Asaad A, Harper N, Webb S, Muirhead-Allwood S . Primary collared uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: a safe and reliable treatment option. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(3):407-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.004. View

Aguilar E, Dominguez A, Pena-Algaba C, Castillo-Lopez J . Distance Between the Malleoli and the Ground. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017; 107(2):112-118. DOI: 10.7547/15-013. View

Zhang Q, Liu M, Chai W, Zhang G, Chen J, Li Z . [Total hip arthroplasty with double-tapered cementless femoral stem for hip bony]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013; 27(3):278-82. View

Kuijpers M, Hannink G, Van Steenbergen L, Schreurs B . Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients in The Netherlands: Trend Analysis of >19,000 Primary Hip Replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(12):3704-3711. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.020. View

10.

Hoaglund F, LOW W . Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; (152):10-6. View

11.

Kurtz W . In situ leg length measurement technique in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.003. View

12.

Briem D, Schneider M, Bogner N, Botha N, Gebauer M, Gehrke T . Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2010; 35(5):655-60. PMC: 3080504. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1020-x. View

13.

Lazarinis S, Mattsson P, Milbrink J, Mallmin H, Hailer N . A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop. 2013; 84(1):32-9. PMC: 3584599. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.765623. View

14.

Li M, Hu Y, Xie J . Analysis of the complications of the collum femoris preserving (CFP) prostheses. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015; 48(6):623-7. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0060. View

15.

Ghera S, Bisicchia S . The collum femoris preserving stem: early results. Hip Int. 2013; 23(1):27-32. DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2013.10718. View

16.

Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N . Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 26(5):674-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.001. View

17.

Yoo J, Kim Y, Yoon K, Koo K, Kim J, Nam K . Contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty performed in patients younger than forty years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 78(1):70-5. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30457. View

18.

Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan C, Masri B . Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(9):2000-12. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00331. View

19.

Hu K, Zhang X, Zhu J, Wang C, Ji W, Bai X . Periprosthetic fractures may be more likely in cementless femoral stems with sharp edges. Ir J Med Sci. 2009; 179(3):417-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0442-1. View

20.

Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View