» Articles » PMID: 30372386

Imaging Advances in the Management of Kidney Cancer

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Oct 30
PMID 30372386
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New developments in cross-sectional imaging, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual-energy computed tomography, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, together with novel application of existing and novel radiotracers, have changed the landscape of renal mass characterization (ie, virtual biopsy) as well as the detection of metastatic disease, prognostication, and response assessment in patients with advanced kidney cancer. A host of imaging response criteria have been developed to characterize the response to targeted and immune therapies and correlate with patient outcomes, each with strengths and limitations. Recent efforts to advance the field are aimed at increasing objectivity with quantitative techniques and the use of banks of imaging data to match the vast genomic data that are becoming available. The emerging field of radiogenomics has the potential to transform further the role of imaging in kidney cancer management through eventual noninvasive characterization of the tumor histology and genetic microenvironment in single renal masses and/or metastatic disease. We review of the effect of currently available imaging techniques in the management of patients with kidney cancer, including localized, locally advanced, and metastatic disease.

Citing Articles

Cancer Incidence Trends in Successive Social Generations in the US.

Rosenberg P, Miranda-Filho A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(6):e2415731.

PMID: 38857048 PMC: 11165384. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15731.


Kidney Cancer Incidence among Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native Populations in the United States, 1999 to 2020.

Melkonian S, Jim M, Haverkamp D, Lee M, Janitz A, Campbell J Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(8):1065-1072.

PMID: 38727561 PMC: 11293958. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0179.


Disparities in Trend of Renal Cell Carcinoma Mortality in the United States.

Doddi S, Rashid M Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024; 4(3):256-263.

PMID: 38707733 PMC: 11062163. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10317.


Patient-specific, deliverable, and self-expandable surgical guide development and evaluation using 4D printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Ock J, Gwon E, Kim T, On S, Moon S, Kyung Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5722.

PMID: 38459159 PMC: 10924080. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56075-5.


Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography for renal tumor detection in human kidneys.

Yan F, Wang C, Yan Y, Zhang Q, Yu Z, Patel S Opt Lasers Eng. 2023; 173.

PMID: 37982078 PMC: 10653339. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107900.


References
1.
Chandrasekar T, Ahmad A, Fadaak K, Jhaveri K, Bhatt J, Jewett M . Natural History of Complex Renal Cysts: Clinical Evidence Supporting Active Surveillance. J Urol. 2017; 199(3):633-640. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.078. View

2.
Dodelzon K, Mussi T, Babb J, Taneja S, Rosenkrantz A . Prediction of growth rate of solid renal masses: utility of MR imaging features--preliminary experience. Radiology. 2012; 262(3):884-93. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111074. View

3.
Gorin M, Rowe S, Baras A, Solnes L, Ball M, Pierorazio P . Prospective Evaluation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytomas and Hybrid Oncocytic/Chromophobe Tumors. Eur Urol. 2015; 69(3):413-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.056. View

4.
Pedrosa I, Chou M, Ngo L, Baroni R, Genega E, Galaburda L . MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol. 2007; 18(2):365-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0757-0. View

5.
Choueiri T, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring P, Rini B, Donskov F . Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(19):1814-23. PMC: 5024539. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. View