» Articles » PMID: 30372376

Behind Closed Doors: How Advanced Cancer Couples Communicate at Home

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Oct 30
PMID 30372376
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Describe communication between patients with advanced cancer and their spouse/partner caregivers.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Sample: 83 advanced cancer patient-spouse caregiver couples.

Methods: Couples completed surveys and recorded naturalistic communication for one day. Descriptive analysis was performed on self-report and observational communication data.

Findings: Both patients and caregivers self-reported high likelihood of engaging in positive interactions. The majority of observed communication was logistical or social small-talk. Cancer and relationship talk was highly skewed; many couples had no talk in these domains.

Conclusion: This study is one of the first to assess continuous naturalistic observation of communication in the homes of couples coping with advanced cancer. We found that routine aspects of daily life continue even when couples are facing important challenges. Implications for Psychosocial Providers: There appear to be few naturalistic cues encouraging couples to discuss potentially difficult topics. More work is needed to determine appropriate levels of communication.

Citing Articles

Associations between dyadic communication and dyadic coping of patients with cervical cancer and their spouses: a study utilizing the actor-partner interdependence model.

Zhi S, Gu W, Miao R, Zhang L, Jing X, Ramachandran H Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(2):90.

PMID: 38190000 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08304-2.


Patient-Caregiver Dyads' Prognostic Information Preferences and Perceptions in Advanced Cancer.

van der Velden N, Smets E, Hagedoorn M, Applebaum A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, van Laarhoven H J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023; 65(5):442-455.e2.

PMID: 36731806 PMC: 10285690. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.012.


Care provided by older adult caregivers to a spouse in active cancer treatment: a scoping review.

Donison V, Toledano N, Sigal A, McGilton K, Alibhai S, Puts M Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(11):8679-8688.

PMID: 35661256 PMC: 9166670. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07176-2.


Impact of Relationship and Communication Variables on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Advanced Cancer Caregivers.

Otto A, Soriano E, Birmingham W, Vadaparampil S, Heyman R, Ellington L Ann Behav Med. 2021; 56(4):405-413.

PMID: 34244701 PMC: 8976288. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab057.


Oncology Couples' Retreats: A Focus on Relationships Between Patients and Their Caregivers.

Hacker-Prietz A, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Onners B, Street J J Adv Pract Oncol. 2021; 10(7):702-709.

PMID: 33391854 PMC: 7517779. DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.7.6.


References
1.
Graber E, Laurenceau J, Miga E, Chango J, Coan J . Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts. J Fam Psychol. 2011; 25(4):541-50. DOI: 10.1037/a0024507. View

2.
Badr H, Carmack C, Kashy D, Cristofanilli M, Revenson T . Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(2):169-80. PMC: 3138118. DOI: 10.1037/a0018165. View

3.
Kim Y, Kashy D, Wellisch D, Spillers R, Kaw C, Smith T . Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35(2):230-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-008-9026-y. View

4.
Kershaw T, Ellis K, Yoon H, Schafenacker A, Katapodi M, Northouse L . The Interdependence of Advanced Cancer Patients' and Their Family Caregivers' Mental Health, Physical Health, and Self-Efficacy over Time. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49(6):901-11. PMC: 4825326. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-015-9743-y. View

5.
Traa M, de Vries J, Bodenmann G, Den Oudsten B . Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2014; 20(1):85-114. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12094. View