» Articles » PMID: 30371233

Elimination of Purkinje Fibers by Electroporation Reduces Ventricular Fibrillation Vulnerability

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 30
PMID 30371233
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background The Purkinje network appears to play a pivotal role in the triggering as well as maintenance of ventricular fibrillation. Irreversible electroporation ( IRE ) using direct current has shown promise as a nonthermal ablation modality in the heart, but its ability to target and ablate the Purkinje tissue is undefined. Our aim was to investigate the potential for selective ablation of Purkinje/fascicular fibers using IRE . Methods and Results In an ex vivo Langendorff model of canine heart (n=8), direct current was delivered in a unipolar manner at various dosages from 750 to 2500 V, in 10 pulses with a 90-μs duration at a frequency of 1 Hz. The window of ventricular fibrillation vulnerability was assessed before and after delivery of electroporation energy using a shock on T-wave method. IRE consistently eradicated all Purkinje potentials at voltages between 750 and 2500 V (minimum field strength of 250-833 V/cm). The ventricular electrogram amplitude was only minimally reduced by ablation: 0.6±2.3 mV ( P=0.03). In 4 hearts after IRE delivery, ventricular fibrillation could not be reinduced. At baseline, the lower limit of vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation was 1.8±0.4 J, and the upper limit of vulnerability was 19.5±3.0 J. The window of vulnerability was 17.8±2.9 J. Delivery of electroporation energy significantly reduced the window of vulnerability to 5.7±2.9 J ( P=0.0003), with a postablation lower limit of vulnerability=7.3±2.63 J, and the upper limit of vulnerability=18.8±5.2 J. Conclusions Our study highlights that Purkinje tissue can be ablated with IRE without any evidence of underlying myocardial damage.

Citing Articles

Empirical disconnection of left posterior fascicle: a new paradigm in catheter ablation of ventricular fibrillation.

Mugnai G, Bolzan B, Franchi E, Capocci S, Pellegrini N, Ribichini F J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39928276 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-02010-1.


Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Yavin H, Prasad M, Gordon J, Aksu T, Huang H J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852288 PMC: 11766314. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010010.


Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update.

Ezzeddine F, Asirvatham S, Nguyen D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274404 PMC: 11396515. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175191.


Preclinical evaluation of reversible pulsed electrical field: electrophysiological and histological assessment of myocardium.

Zhai Z, Ling Y, Wang Y, Shi L, Liu X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1426920.

PMID: 39149581 PMC: 11325456. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426920.


Nanosecond pulse electric field treatment initiates mitochondrial apoptosis pathway by inducing mitochondrial morphological changes in myocardial cells.

Fan A, Liu G, Wu X J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39093488 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01828-5.


References
1.
Madhavan M, Venkatachalam K, Swale M, DeSimone C, Gard J, Johnson S . Novel Percutaneous Epicardial Autonomic Modulation in the Canine for Atrial Fibrillation: Results of an Efficacy and Safety Study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 39(5):407-17. PMC: 4846530. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12824. View

2.
Neven K, van Driel V, van Wessel H, van Es R, du Pre B, Doevendans P . Safety and feasibility of closed chest epicardial catheter ablation using electroporation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7(5):913-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001607. View

3.
Vogel J, Rombouts S, de Rooij T, van Delden O, Dijkgraaf M, van Gulik T . Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Resection or Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (IMPALA): A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(9):2734-2743. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5900-9. View

4.
Neven K, van Driel V, van Wessel H, van Es R, Doevendans P, Wittkampf F . Epicardial linear electroporation ablation and lesion size. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11(8):1465-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.031. View

5.
Fabritz C, Kirchhof P, Behrens S, Zabel M, Franz M . Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996; 7(3):231-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00520.x. View