» Articles » PMID: 30369697

Current Practices of Physical and Occupational Therapists Regarding Spasticity Assessment and Treatment

Overview
Journal Physiother Can
Date 2018 Oct 30
PMID 30369697
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand current trends in rehabilitation practice regarding spasticity assessment and treatment. The clinical practices of Canadian physiotherapists and occupational therapists in assessing and treating spasticity were investigated using a self-administered, Web-based questionnaire (cross-sectional design). Experienced clinicians developed the questionnaire, which surveyed socio-demographic characteristics, work environment, and clinician satisfaction with spasticity assessments and preferences for treatment. A total of 317 clinicians (204 physiotherapists and 113 occupational therapists) completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants reported that using valid and reliable outcome measures to assess spasticity was important (91.1%). Most clinicians indicated using a combination of spasticity assessments, and their level of satisfaction with these assessments was very high. All clinicians believed that spasticity should be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals, and most indicated that it should be assessed by more than one professional. Although 83.8% indicated that spasticity should be tested on admission, a much lower percentage believed that it should be evaluated throughout rehabilitation. Most clinicians (92.2%) reported using multiple treatment modalities for spasticity. This study is the first to document clinicians' practices regarding spasticity assessment and treatment. A better understanding of current trends in physiotherapy and occupational therapy will help in tailoring strategies to improve practice.

Citing Articles

Physiotherapy assessment of people with neurological conditions in Australia: A national survey.

Garner J, Lange B, Lennon S, Van Den Berg M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(6):e2117.

PMID: 38831776 PMC: 11144609. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2117.

References
1.
Pandyan A, Johnson G, Price C, Curless R, Barnes M, Rodgers H . A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1191/026921599677595404. View

2.
Richardson D . Physical therapy in spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2002; 9 Suppl 1:17-22; dicussion 53-61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1017.x. View

3.
Jette D, Bacon K, Batty C, Carlson M, Ferland A, Hemingway R . Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2003; 83(9):786-805. View

4.
Rizzo M, Hadjimichael O, Preiningerova J, Vollmer T . Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler. 2004; 10(5):589-95. DOI: 10.1191/1352458504ms1085oa. View

5.
Thompson A, Jarrett L, Lockley L, Marsden J, Stevenson V . Clinical management of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76(4):459-63. PMC: 1739594. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.035972. View