The Effect of Five Different Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Success of Class I Restorations: 24-month Clinical Follow-up

Overview

Journal Clin Oral Investig

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2018 Oct 29

PMID 30368662

Citations 12

Authors

Nazire Nurdan Cakir

Sezer Demirbuga

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of universal adhesives on the restoration success of Class I carious lesions.

Materials And Methods: Five different universal adhesives (Gluma Bond Universal (GU), Clearfil Universal (CU), Prime&Bond Elect Universal (PU), All bond Universal (AU), and Single Bond Universal (SU)) were used in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes in 42 patients. The study was conducted with 10 groups, with 20 restorations in each group. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and during a 24-month recall using World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The changes in the parameters were analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results: At the end of 24 months, there was no loss of restoration in any group. According to the USPHS, there was no difference in the baseline and 24-month clinical behavior of the restorations (P ˃ 0.05). However, according to the FDI, when adhesives were used in the self-etch mode, three adhesives (GU, SU, PU) showed marginal incompatibility, and one adhesive showed (GU) marginal discoloration between baseline and the 24-month follow-up evaluation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference after 24 months between etch-and-rinse and self-etch groups according to the results based on both the USPHS and FDI criteria (P ˃ 0.05).

Conclusions: The 24-month clinical performance of the evaluated universal adhesives depends on the adhesive strategy.

Clinical Relevance: This study helps clinicians to decide in which mode (etch-and-rinse or self-etch) universal adhesives can be safely used.

Citing Articles

Prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive in Class I and Class II restorations at 1 year.

Perdigao J, Chew H, Lee I, Woodis K, Hatch B Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 29(1):38.

PMID: 39739062 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06121-3.

The role of etching protocols on bond strength of universal adhesives applied to caries affected dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karadas M, Bedir F, Demirbuga S Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(12):683.

PMID: 39633107 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06089-0.

Shear bond strength of different tooth color restorative materials after using silver diamine fluoride in primary tooth dentin: An study.

Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Rafiee A, Khosronia M, Alizadeh M, Vossoughi M Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024; 21:42.

PMID: 39188389 PMC: 11346615.

Patients´ satisfaction concerning direct anterior dental restoration.

de Freitas B, Silva P, Pintado-Palomino K, Almeida C, Souza-Gabriel A, Corona S Braz Dent J. 2023; 34(3):82-93.

PMID: 37466529 PMC: 10355263. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202305260.

Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.

Barceleiro M, Tardem C, Albuquerque E, Lopes L, Marins S, Poubel L J Appl Oral Sci. 2023; 31:e20220323.

PMID: 36790298 PMC: 9972856. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2022-0323.

References

Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M, Snauwaert J, Abe Y . Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(6):1565-9. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800061701. View

Pashley D, Agee K, Carvalho R, Lee K, Tay F, Callison T . Effects of water and water-free polar solvents on the tensile properties of demineralized dentin. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(5):347-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00065-9. View

Van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P . Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(3):215-35. View

Lin A, McIntyre N, Davidson R . Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res. 1992; 71(11):1836-41. DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710111401. View

Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B . Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(9):864-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003. View

van Dijken J, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Lindberg A . Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater. 2006; 23(9):1101-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.005. View

Hickel R, Roulet J, Bayne S, Heintze S, Mjor I, Peters M . Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007; 11(1):5-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7. View

Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y . 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(1):3-10. DOI: 10.2341/06-46. View

Rotta M, Bresciani P, Moura S, Grande R, Hilgert L, Baratieri L . Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 9(6):537-45. View

10.

Erickson R, Barkmeier W, Kimmes N . Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(10):1187-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.004. View

11.

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M . FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010; 12(4):259-72. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262. View

12.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B . Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010; 26(12):1176-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.190. View

13.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K . State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2010; 27(1):17-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023. View

14.

Pashley D, Tay F, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho R, Carrilho M . State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2010; 27(1):1-16. PMC: 3857593. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016. View

15.

Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni C, Ciaramicoli M, Kiyan V, Queiroz C . Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Oper Dent. 2011; 37(1):3-11. DOI: 10.2341/11-222-C. View

16.

Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T . Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 2012; 91(4):376-81. DOI: 10.1177/0022034512437375. View

17.

Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B . Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40(6):475-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012. View

18.

Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, Paula E, Tay L, Reis A, Loguercio A . A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013; 25(1):55-69. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12005. View

19.

Munoz M, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio A, Bombarda N . Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013; 41(5):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001. View

20.

Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano A, De Paula E, Tay L, Reis A . A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013; 39(2):113-27. DOI: 10.2341/13-045-C. View