» Articles » PMID: 30366392

Emulsion Stabilization with Functionalized Cellulose Nanoparticles Fabricated Using Deep Eutectic Solvents

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Oct 28
PMID 30366392
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this experiment, the influence of the morphology and surface characteristics of cellulosic nanoparticles (i.e., cellulose nanocrystals [CNCs] and cellulose nanofibers [CNFs]) on oil-in-water (/) emulsion stabilization was studied using non-modified or functionalized nanoparticles obtained following deep eutectic solvent (DES) pre-treatments. The effect of the oil-to-water ratio (5, 10, and 20 wt.-% (weight percent) of oil), the type of nanoparticle, and the concentration of the particles (0.05⁻0.2 wt.-%) on the oil-droplet size (using laser diffractometry), / emulsion stability (via analytical centrifugation), and stabilization mechanisms (using field emission scanning electron microscopy with the model compound-i.e., polymerized styrene in water emulsions) were examined. All the cellulosic nanoparticles studied decreased the oil droplet size in emulsion (sizes varied from 22.5 µm to 8.9 µm, depending on the nanoparticle used). Efficient / emulsion stabilization against coalescence and an oil droplet-stabilizing web-like structure were obtained only, however, with surface-functionalized CNFs, which had a moderate hydrophilicity level. CNFs without surface functionalization did not prevent either the coalescence or the creaming of emulsions, probably due to the natural hydrophobicity of the nanoparticles and their instability in water. Moderately hydrophilic CNCs, on the other hand, distributed evenly and displayed good interaction with both dispersion phases. The rigid structure of CNCs meant, however, that voluminous web structures were not formed on the surface of oil droplets; they formed in flat, uniform layers instead. Consequently, emulsion stability was lower with CNCs, when compared with surface-functionalized CNFs. Tunable cellulose nanoparticles can be used in several applications such as in enhanced marine oil response.

Citing Articles

Tailoring Hydrogel Structures: Investigating the Effects of Multistep Cellulose Defibrillation on Polyvinyl Alcohol Composites.

de Lima G, Aggio B, Cristina Pedro A, de M de Lima T, Magalhaes W Gels. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 38534630 PMC: 10970658. DOI: 10.3390/gels10030212.


Metal-Organic Framework-Stabilized High Internal Phase Pickering Emulsions Based on Computer Simulation for Curcumin Encapsulation: Comprehensive Characterization and Stability Mechanism.

Ma P, Zhang J, Teng Z, Zhang Y, Bauchan G, Luo Y ACS Omega. 2021; 6(40):26556-26565.

PMID: 34661010 PMC: 8515605. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03932.


Use of Deep Eutectic Solvents in Polymer Chemistry-A Review.

Jablonsky M, Skulcova A, Sima J Molecules. 2019; 24(21).

PMID: 31684174 PMC: 6864848. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213978.

References
1.
Visanko M, Liimatainen H, Sirvio J, Heiskanen J, Niinimaki J, Hormi O . Amphiphilic cellulose nanocrystals from acid-free oxidative treatment: physicochemical characteristics and use as an oil-water stabilizer. Biomacromolecules. 2014; 15(7):2769-75. DOI: 10.1021/bm500628g. View

2.
Visanko M, Liimatainen H, Sirvio J, Haapala A, Sliz R, Niinimaki J . Porous thin film barrier layers from 2,3-dicarboxylic acid cellulose nanofibrils for membrane structures. Carbohydr Polym. 2014; 102:584-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.006. View

3.
Vafaei S, Purkayastha A, Jain A, Ramanath G, Borca-Tasciuc T . The effect of nanoparticles on the liquid-gas surface tension of Bi2Te3 nanofluids. Nanotechnology. 2009; 20(18):185702. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185702. View

4.
Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, Capron I . New Pickering emulsions stabilized by bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir. 2011; 27(12):7471-9. DOI: 10.1021/la200971f. View

5.
Cherhal F, Cousin F, Capron I . Structural Description of the Interface of Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Cellulose Nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules. 2015; 17(2):496-502. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01413. View