» Articles » PMID: 30356623

Shock Attenuation, Spatio-temporal and Physiological Parameter Comparisons Between Land Treadmill and Water Treadmill Running

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 26
PMID 30356623
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare shock attenuation, spatio-temporal and physiological parameters during water immersed (depth: anterior superior iliac spine) aquatic treadmill (ATM) running and land based treadmill (LTM) running matched for speed.

Methods: Six participants completed 15 min running under 2 conditions (LTM and ATM) in a randomised and balanced order, matched for speed. Synchronised tri-axial accelerometers placed at the distal tibia, lumbar region, and forehead were used to identify running dynamics and measure acceleration on impact and its attenuation. Expired respiratory gases and heart rate were sampled on a breath-by-breath basis for physiological variable collection throughout each trial.

Results: Participants experienced reduced accelerations on impact at the distal tibia (<0.0001) but not the lower back ( = 0.1363) or forehead ( = 0.0551) during ATM compared to LTM. Consequently, large reductions in shock attenuation occurred during the ATM compared to LTM ( = 0.0001). Stride frequency was greater (<0.0001) and stride length was shorter (= 0.0341) as a result of reduced swing time (= 0.0201) for LTM, whilst ATM running increased physiological demand for both heart rate (<0.0001) and O (<0.0001) compared to LTM.

Conclusion: These findings show ATM reduces impact stress on the passive structures of the lower limbs whilst increasing physiological demand when running at matched speeds.

Citing Articles

Wearable technologies for monitoring aquatic exercises: A systematic review.

Monoli C, Tuhtan J, Piccinini L, Galli M Clin Rehabil. 2022; 37(6):791-807.

PMID: 36437591 PMC: 10126456. DOI: 10.1177/02692155221141039.


Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Benson L, RAisAnen A, Clermont C, Ferber R Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(5).

PMID: 35270869 PMC: 8915128. DOI: 10.3390/s22051722.


Effects of Exercise-Induced Fatigue on Lower Extremity Joint Mechanics, Stiffness, and Energy Absorption during Landings.

Zhang X, Xia R, Dai B, Sun X, Fu W J Sports Sci Med. 2018; 17(4):640-649.

PMID: 30479533 PMC: 6243627.


Do Strike Patterns or Shoe Conditions have a Predominant Influence on Foot Loading?.

Sun X, Yang Y, Wang L, Zhang X, Fu W J Hum Kinet. 2018; 64:13-23.

PMID: 30429895 PMC: 6231350. DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0205.

References
1.
Munro C, Miller D, Fuglevand A . Ground reaction forces in running: a reexamination. J Biomech. 1987; 20(2):147-55. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90306-x. View

2.
Stanitski C . Common injuries in preadolescent and adolescent athletes. Recommendations for prevention. Sports Med. 1989; 7(1):32-41. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198907010-00003. View

3.
Gleim G, Nicholas J . Metabolic costs and heart rate responses to treadmill walking in water at different depths and temperatures. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17(2):248-52. DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700216. View

4.
Macdermid P, Fink P, Stannard S . Transference of 3D accelerations during cross country mountain biking. J Biomech. 2014; 47(8):1829-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.024. View

5.
Mercer J, DeVita P, Derrick T, Bates B . Individual effects of stride length and frequency on shock attenuation during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(2):307-13. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048837.81430.E7. View