» Articles » PMID: 30356243

Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Feedback Delay on the Qualitative Subjective Experience of Virtual Reality

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Oct 26
PMID 30356243
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When interacting with virtual environments, feedback delays between making a movement and seeing the visual consequences of that movement are detrimental for the subjective quality of the VR experience. Here we used standard measures of subjective experiences such as ownership, agency and presence to investigate whether prolonged exposure to the delay, and thus the possibility to adapt to it, leads to the recovery of the qualitative experience of VR. Participants performed a target-tracking task in a Virtual Reality environment. We measured the participants' tracking performance in terms of spatial and temporal errors with respect to the target in both No-Delay and Delay conditions. Additionally, participants rated their sense of "ownership" of holding a virtual tool, agency and presence on each trial using sliding scales. These single trial ratings were compared to the results of the more traditional questionnaires for ownership and agency and presence for both No-Delay and Delay conditions. We found that the participants' sliding scales ratings corresponded very well to the scores obtained from the traditional questionnaires. Moreover, not only did participants behaviourally adapt to the delay, their ratings of ownership and agency significantly improved with prolonged exposure to the delay. Together the results suggest a tight link between the ability to perform a behavioural task and the subjective ratings of ownership and agency in virtual reality.

Citing Articles

Using event-related brain potentials to evaluate motor-auditory latencies in virtual reality.

Feder S, Miksch J, Grimm S, Krems J, Bendixen A Front Neuroergon. 2024; 4:1196507.

PMID: 38234486 PMC: 10790907. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1196507.


Virtual Reality for Vision Science.

Hibbard P Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023; 65:131-159.

PMID: 36723780 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2023_416.


Influence of hand-arm self-avatar motion delay on the directional perception induced by an illusory sensation of being twisted.

Amemiya T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6626.

PMID: 35459875 PMC: 9033828. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10543-y.


Larger visual changes compress time: The inverted effect of asemantic visual features on interval time perception.

Malpica S, Masia B, Herman L, Wetzstein G, Eagleman D, Gutierrez D PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0265591.

PMID: 35316292 PMC: 8939824. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265591.


Different contributions of efferent and reafferent feedback to sensorimotor temporal recalibration.

Arikan B, van Kemenade B, Fiehler K, Kircher T, Drewing K, Straube B Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22631.

PMID: 34799622 PMC: 8604902. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02016-5.


References
1.
Cunningham D, Billock V, Tsou B . Sensorimotor adaptation to violations of temporal contiguity. Psychol Sci. 2002; 12(6):532-5. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.d01-17. View

2.
Rohde M, Greiner L, Ernst M . Asymmetries in visuomotor recalibration of time perception: does causal binding distort the window of integration?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013; 147:127-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.011. View

3.
Keetels M, Vroomen J . Exposure to delayed visual feedback of the hand changes motor-sensory synchrony perception. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 219(4):431-40. PMC: 3366181. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3081-0. View

4.
Slater M, Spanlang B, Sanchez-Vives M, Blanke O . First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS One. 2010; 5(5):e10564. PMC: 2868878. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010564. View

5.
Maselli A, Slater M . The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:83. PMC: 3604638. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00083. View