» Articles » PMID: 30352528

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Functional Recovery After Stroke: Studies in Animal Models

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Oct 25
PMID 30352528
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability, but treatment options remain limited, leaving most patients with incomplete recovery. Patient and animal studies have shown potential of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) strategies to improve function after stroke. However, mechanisms underlying therapeutic effects of NIBS are unclear and there is no consensus on which NIBS protocols are most effective.

Objective: Provide a review of articles that assessed effects and mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in animal stroke models.

Methods: Articles were searched in PubMed, including cross-references.

Results: Nineteen eligible studies reporting effects of rTMS or tDCS after stroke in small rodents were identified. Seventeen of those described improved functional recovery or neuroprotection compared with untreated control or sham-stimulated groups. The effects of rTMS could be related to molecular mechanisms associated with ischemic tolerance, neuroprotection, anti-apoptosis, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, or neuroplasticity. Favorable outcome appeared most effectively when using high-frequency (>5 Hz) rTMS or intermittent theta burst stimulation of the ipsilesional hemisphere. tDCS effects were strongly dependent on stimulation polarity and onset time. Although these findings are promising, most studies did not meet Good Laboratory Practice assessment criteria.

Conclusions: Despite limited data availability, animal stroke model studies demonstrate potential of NIBS to promote stroke recovery through different working mechanisms. Future studies in animal stroke models should adhere to Good Laboratory Practice guidelines and aim to further develop clinically applicable treatment protocols by identifying most favorable stimulation parameters, treatment onset, adjuvant therapies, and underlying modes of action.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the efficacy of different protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function, activities of daily living, and neurological function in patients with early stroke: a....

Ni X, Yuan Z, Xie R, Zhai X, Cheng X, Pan Y Neurol Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 39910020 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-025-08000-5.


Magnetic field in the extreme low frequency band protects neuronal and microglia cells from oxygen-glucose deprivation.

Mata P, Calovi S, Benli K, Iglesias L, Hernandez M, Martin A Front Cell Neurosci. 2024; 18:1455158.

PMID: 39553829 PMC: 11563784. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2024.1455158.


Time dependent changes in protein expression induced by intermittent theta burst stimulation in a cell line.

Ismail F, Krishnan M, Jayaraj R, Bru-Mercier G, Pessia M, Ljubisavljevic M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1396776.

PMID: 39529622 PMC: 11551774. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1396776.


Effects of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis.

Yang Y, Chang W, Ding J, Xu H, Wu X, Ma L Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(9):4399-4416.

PMID: 38600332 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07504-w.


Clinical Comparison between HD-tDCS and tDCS for Improving Upper Limb Motor Function: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Zeng Y, Cheng R, Zhang L, Fang S, Zhang S, Wang M Neural Plast. 2024; 2024:2512796.

PMID: 38585306 PMC: 10999289. DOI: 10.1155/2024/2512796.


References
1.
Jiang T, Xu R, Zhang A, Di W, Xiao Z, Miao J . Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on hemichannel pannexin-1 and neural plasticity in rat model of cerebral infarction. Neuroscience. 2012; 226:421-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.035. View

2.
Yoon K, Lee Y, Han T . Mechanism of functional recovery after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the subacute cerebral ischemic rat model: neural plasticity or anti-apoptosis?. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 214(4):549-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2853-2. View

3.
Guo F, Lou J, Han X, Deng Y, Huang X . Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment by Enhancing Neurogenesis and Suppressing Apoptosis in the Hippocampus in Rats with Ischemic Stroke. Front Physiol. 2017; 8:559. PMC: 5539749. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00559. View

4.
Notturno F, Pace M, Zappasodi F, Cam E, Bassetti C, Uncini A . Neuroprotective effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in a rat stroke model. J Neurol Sci. 2014; 342(1-2):146-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.017. View

5.
Carmichael S . Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59(5):735-42. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20845. View