» Articles » PMID: 30350010

Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Efficacy in Different Clinical Stages of PSA Failure After Radical Therapy

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 24
PMID 30350010
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective was the evaluation of Gallium 68 (Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) detection rate, for identifying the site of prostate cancer (PCa) relapse (local vs systemic), stratifying the population according to different clinical stages of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Secondary aims were: 1) to evaluate the association of clinical/pathologic features and Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, 2) to compare Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with other imaging procedures, and 3) to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) in a per-patient analysis.

Material And Methods: This population was enrolled through a prospective, open label, single-center trial performed at the Nuclear Medicine of the University Hospital of Bologna (Eudract: 2015-004589-27 OsSC). The inclusion criteria were: (1) proven PCa, (2) surgery or radiotherapy as definitive therapy, (3) proven BCR, (4) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 0.2-2 ng/ml, (5) age ≥ 35 years, and 6() willing to sign an informed consent. Three-hundred and thirty-two (332) patients were enrolled between March 2016 and June 2017; mean/median PSA was 0.84/0.61 ng/ml, 97.9% (325/332) of patients received radical prostatectomy and 2.1% (7/332) radiotherapy. Different patterns of BCR were identified by referent physicians as follows: (a) persisting detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy in 13.5% (45/332) of patients (subgroup 1), (b) first-time PSA failure after radical therapy in 44.9% (149/332) (subgroup 2), and (c) PSA increase after salvage or hormonal therapy in 41.6% (138/332) (subgroup 3).

Results: Primary objective: Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate was 53.6% (CI 95% 48.1%-59.1%). In a patient-based analysis, disease confined to pelvis (prostate bed and/or lymph-nodes) was detected in 24.7% of cases (82/332). The presence of at least one distant lesion was observed in 28.9% of cases (96/332). The detection rate in different subgroups was: subgroup 1 = 64.5%, subgroup 2 = 45.6%, and subgroup-3  = 58.7%. Secondary objectives: 1) PSA (p = 0.041) and PSAdt (p = 0.001) showed association with Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate, and 2) correlative imaging was available in 73.2% of patients (243/332). When Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive, correlative imaging resulted negative in 83% of cases (108/130). 3) The calculated PPV was 96.2%.

Conclusion: Our data confirmed the efficacy of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting local vs systemic disease in PCa patients presenting PSA failure after radical therapy. Furthermore, Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detection rate is different depending on the clinical stage of BCR, and this information should be taken into consideration by referring physicians.

Citing Articles

The Application of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: Status and Challenge.

Zeng T, Xie Y, Chai K, Sang H Onco Targets Ther. 2024; 17:991-1015.

PMID: 39564453 PMC: 11573878. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S485869.


Size and SUV define the contribution of nodal metastases to PSA in oligorecurrent prostate cancer.

Falkenbach F, Schmalhofer M, Tian Z, Mazzucato G, Karakiewicz P, Graefen M Prostate. 2024; 85(1):105-111.

PMID: 39380448 PMC: 11609951. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24806.


Comparison of digital and analog [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients: a prospective study.

Kim Y, Lee D, Sung C, Lee S, Oh S, Oh J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14989.

PMID: 38951530 PMC: 11217435. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65399-1.


Targeted interleukin-2 enhances the in vivo anti-cancer activity of Pluvicto™.

Georgiev T, Principi L, Galbiati A, Gilardoni E, Neri D, Cazzamalli S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(8):2332-2337.

PMID: 38563883 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06705-x.


Application of targeted diagnosis of PSMA in the modality shift of prostate cancer diagnosis: a review.

Yan L, Zhang Z, Wang T, Yuan L, Sun X, Su P Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1179595.

PMID: 37727211 PMC: 10505927. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1179595.


References
1.
Khan M, Carter H, Epstein J, Miller M, Landis P, Walsh P . Can prostate specific antigen derivatives and pathological parameters predict significant change in expectant management criteria for prostate cancer?. J Urol. 2003; 170(6 Pt 1):2274-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097124.21878.6b. View

2.
Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Haufe S . Diagnostic performance of Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 44(8):1258-1268. PMC: 5486817. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7. View

3.
Roach P, Francis R, Emmett L, Hsiao E, Kneebone A, Hruby G . The Impact of Ga-PSMA PET/CT on Management Intent in Prostate Cancer: Results of an Australian Prospective Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med. 2017; 59(1):82-88. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197160. View

4.
Ost P, Bossi A, Decaestecker K, De Meerleer G, Giannarini G, Karnes R . Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(5):852-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.004. View

5.
Stephenson A, Scardino P, Kattan M, Pisansky T, Slawin K, Klein E . Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(15):2035-41. PMC: 2670394. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9607. View