» Articles » PMID: 30346989

The Impact of Prices on Alcoholic Beverage Consumption in Chile

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Oct 23
PMID 30346989
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Objective: Chile is among the countries with the highest alcohol consumption per capita in Latin America, but little has been done in the way of public policy and policy research to overcome this problem. The objective of the present study is to estimate demand elasticities (own-price, cross-price, expenditure and quality) for three groups of alcoholic beverages in Chile: spirits, wines, and beers.

Data And Methods: The study uses data from the VII Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares (Family Budget Survey) 2011-2012 conducted by the National Institute of Statistics. Because of problems with the quality of the measurement units, hot-deck imputation method was used with the alcohol purchases that presented problems. To estimate the demand elasticities, the Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS) method proposed by Deaton was used. Quality decisions were estimated for each beverage separately using an equation proposed by Deaton in the three-step AIDS.

Results: The estimated elasticities were more inelastic for spirits (-0.14, P<0.01), followed by wines (-0.77, P<0.01) and beers (-0.93, P<0.01). Spirits reported less sensitivity to changes in the total budget, while wines reported the most sensitivity to changes in the total budget (expenditure elasticity). Wines also reported the most sensitivity related to quality for changes in the total budget (0,20, meaning that a 10% increase in a household's total expenditure increases the "quality" of purchased wines by 2%).

Conclusions: Own-price elasticities reported for spirits, wines and beers are consistently negative, and inelastic, in line with international evidence. Although own-price elasticities for spirits is more inelastic than found in most studies, its quality-elasticity is more positive and greater. This could be explained by the greater price dispersion of spirits, as well as spirits (and wine) being consumed more than beers in Chile. This in turn may be because consumers have the option of switching to cheaper, Chilean-produced spirits such as pisco and wines when prices rise. The existence of these relatively broad quality-elasticities points to the need for a change in the alcohol tax structure from the current ad-valorem tax to a specific tax that could reduce price dispersion and curb total consumption.

Citing Articles

A snapshot of cancer in Chile II: an update on research, strategies and analytical frameworks for equity, innovation and national development.

Vacarezza C, Araneda J, Gonzalez P, Arteaga O, Marcelain K, Castellon E Biol Res. 2024; 57(1):95.

PMID: 39696714 PMC: 11657627. DOI: 10.1186/s40659-024-00574-2.


Cheers to anxiety: Granger causality insights on alcohol consumption patterns across 13 South American countries.

Palliyaguru D, Senarathne B, Jayathilaka R, Rajamanthri L, Wickramarachchi C BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2664.

PMID: 39350108 PMC: 11441160. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20146-z.


Adapting existing behaviour: Perceptions of substance switching and implementation of minimum pricing for alcohol in Wales.

Livingston W, Holloway K, May T, Buhociu M, Madoc-Jones I, Perkins A Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022; 38(1):22-34.

PMID: 35309092 PMC: 8899056. DOI: 10.1177/1455072520972304.


Differential impacts of ridesharing on alcohol-related crashes by socioeconomic municipalities: rate of technology adoption matters.

Blazquez C, Laurent J, Nazif-Munoz J BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):2008.

PMID: 34736449 PMC: 8569979. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12066-z.


State or market? How to effectively decrease alcohol-related crash fatalities and injuries.

Nazif-Munoz J, Batomen B, Oulhote Y, Spengler J, Nandi A J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020; 74(6):502-509.

PMID: 32238476 PMC: 7320794. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213191.


References
1.
Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr D . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet. 2009; 373(9682):2234-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60744-3. View

2.
Manning W, Blumberg L, Moulton L . The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price. J Health Econ. 1995; 14(2):123-48. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00042-3. View

3.
Zeigler D, Wang C, Yoast R, Dickinson B, McCaffree M, Robinowitz C . The neurocognitive effects of alcohol on adolescents and college students. Prev Med. 2004; 40(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.044. View

4.
Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2224-60. PMC: 4156511. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. View

5.
Brown S, Tapert S, Granholm E, Delis D . Neurocognitive functioning of adolescents: effects of protracted alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000; 24(2):164-71. View