Field Safety and Effectiveness of New Visceral Leishmaniasis Treatment Regimens Within Public Health Facilities in Bihar, India
Overview
Tropical Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions.
Methods: This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891.
Results: Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3-93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1-91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0-98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9-96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7-97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6-99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related.
Conclusion: All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India.
Trial Registration: Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively).
Musa A, Mbui J, Mohammed R, Olobo J, Ritmeijer K, Alcoba G Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 76(3):e1177-e1185.
PMID: 36164254 PMC: 9907539. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac643.
de Sousa Cavalcante K, Almeida C, Boigny R, Cavalcante F, Correia F, Florencio C Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2022; 64:e52.
PMID: 36074447 PMC: 9448254. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946202264052.
Dahal P, Singh-Phulgenda S, Maguire B, Harriss E, Ritmeijer K, Alves F PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(8):e0009650.
PMID: 34375339 PMC: 8425569. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009650.
Singh-Phulgenda S, Dahal P, Ngu R, Maguire B, Hawryszkiewycz A, Rashan S PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(3):e0009302.
PMID: 33780461 PMC: 8031744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009302.
Goyal V, Rabi Das V, Singh S, Singh R, Pandey K, Verma N PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020; 14(7):e0008429.
PMID: 32687498 PMC: 7392342. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008429.