» Articles » PMID: 30346801

Trends in Neonatal Prophylaxis and Predictors of Combination Antiretroviral Prophylaxis in US Infants from 1990 to 2015

Overview
Date 2018 Oct 23
PMID 30346801
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Postnatal antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis for infants born to women with HIV is a critical component of perinatal HIV transmission prevention. However, variability in prophylaxis regimens remains and consistency with guidelines has not been evaluated in the United States. We evaluated trends over time in prophylaxis regimens among 6386 HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants using pooled data spanning two decades from three US-based cohorts: the Women and Infants Transmission Study (WITS, 1990-2007), Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) 219C (1993-2007), and the PHACS Surveillance Monitoring of ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study (2007-2015). We also identified maternal and infant risk factors for use of combination prophylaxis regimens (≥2 ARVs) and examined consistency with US perinatal guidelines. We found that receipt of combination prophylaxis between 1996 and 2015 ranged from 2% to 15%, with a consistent median duration of 6 weeks. Infants whose mothers had lower CD4 T-cell counts, higher viral load (VL), no antepartum ARVs, age <20 years at delivery, and Cesarean delivery had significantly higher rates of combination prophylaxis, while infants born 2006-2010 (vs. 2011-2015), who were Hispanic or with lower maternal education levels, had significantly lower rates. Predictors for combination prophylaxis varied over time, with the strongest associations of maternal VL in later birth cohorts. While use of combination prophylaxis increased over time, only 50% of high-risk infants received such regimens in 2011-2015. In conclusion, HEU infants at higher risk of HIV acquisition are more likely to receive combination neonatal prophylaxis, consistent with US guidelines. However, substantial variability remains, and infants at higher risk often fail to receive combination prophylaxis.

Citing Articles

Prevention of Perinatal HIV Transmission in an Area of High HIV Prevalence in the United States.

Koay W, Zhang J, Manepalli K, Griffith C, Castel A, Scott R J Pediatr. 2020; 228:101-109.

PMID: 32971142 PMC: 7752838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.041.


A Comparison of Metabolic Outcomes Between Obese HIV-Exposed Uninfected Youth From the PHACS SMARTT Study and HIV-Unexposed Youth From the NHANES Study in the United States.

Jao J, Jacobson D, Yu W, Borkowsky W, Geffner M, McFarland E J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019; 81(3):319-327.

PMID: 30844997 PMC: 6565481. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002018.

References
1.
Peters V, Liu K, Dominguez K, Frederick T, Melville S, Hsu H . Missed opportunities for perinatal HIV prevention among HIV-exposed infants born 1996-2000, pediatric spectrum of HIV disease cohort. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 Pt 2):1186-91. View

2.
Brogly S, Abzug M, Watts D, Cunningham C, Williams P, Oleske J . Birth defects among children born to human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: pediatric AIDS clinical trials protocols 219 and 219C. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010; 29(8):721-7. PMC: 2948952. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181e74a2f. View

3.
Kakkar F, Samson L, Vaudry W, Brophy J, Le Meur J, Lapointe N . Safety of combination antiretroviral prophylaxis in high-risk HIV-exposed newborns: a retrospective review of the Canadian experience. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016; 19(1):20520. PMC: 4753845. DOI: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.20520. View

4.
Williams P, Seage 3rd G, Van Dyke R, Siberry G, Griner R, Tassiopoulos K . A trigger-based design for evaluating the safety of in utero antiretroviral exposure in uninfected children of human immunodeficiency virus-infected mothers. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175(9):950-61. PMC: 3390009. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr401. View

5.
England K, Thorne C . Use of neonatal antiretroviral prophylaxis for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV is decreasing in Western Europe. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(12):1797-800. PMC: 3428872. DOI: 10.1086/599230. View