» Articles » PMID: 30341525

Degrees of Diaphragma Sellae Descent During Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection: Predictive Factors and Effect on Outcome

Overview
Journal Curr Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 21
PMID 30341525
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study is aimed to classify degrees of diaphragma sellae (DS) descent into sella turcica according to the surgical field block caused by the descent and to construct predictive imaging criteria for the degree of descent, and in addition, to determine whether there is any correlation between the degree of DS descent and the operative outcome (in the form of cerebrospinal fluid leak and/or presence of residual tumor). Totally, 72 patients were enrolled in our study. Their clinical and radiological data as well as the high definition videos of operations were retrospectively reviewed. The degree of DS descent during the operation was classified into five degrees according to surgical field block caused by the descent. We investigated the correlation between these five degrees and the clinical findings, radiological findings as well as the surgical outcomes. We found that the most important determining factors of DS descent degree were the volume and the height of the tumor portion above diaphragma opening. On the other hand, the total tumor volume, the maximum tumor height and the morphological pattern according to Wilson's system (modified from Hardy) had no statistically significant correlation with DS degree of descent. Presence of residual tumor on postoperative magnetic resonance images was significantly correlated with Wilson's classification and with supradiaphragmatic tumor height. On the other hand, cerebrospinal fluid leak showed no statistically significant difference between variable degrees of DS descent. Volumetric data of the tumor portion above the diaphragma opening are more important than morphological data for prediction of surgical field block caused by descended DS. While DS prolapse significantly increases the difficulty of the operative procedure, residual tumor presence is mainly dependent on morphological classification, especially cavernous sinus invasion.

Citing Articles

Predictive factors for delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with Rathke's cleft cysts.

Lin K, Pei Z, Zhang Y, Feng T, Wang S Front Oncol. 2022; 12:943666.

PMID: 36176407 PMC: 9513476. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943666.


Change in cephalocaudal tumor cavity diameter after transsphenoidal surgery is a predictor of diabetes insipidus in pituitary adenoma.

Lin K, Fan K, Mu S, Wang S Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):72.

PMID: 35614499 PMC: 9131668. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00700-4.


Utilizing a Novel Pituitary Retractor for Early Descent of the Diaphragma Sellae during Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.

Park J, Chung D, Yoon W J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021; 65(1):114-122.

PMID: 34879644 PMC: 8752885. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0047.


Prediction of the Recurrence of Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas Using Preoperative Supra-Intra Sellar Volume and Tumor-Carotid Distance.

Chen W, Wang M, Duan C, Yao S, Jiao H, Wang Z Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:748997.

PMID: 34659129 PMC: 8515129. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.748997.


Identification of the Extradural and Intradural Extension of Pituitary Adenomas to the Suprasellar Region: Classification, Surgical Strategies, and Outcomes.

Yang Y, Bao Y, Xie S, Tang B, Wu X, Yang L Front Oncol. 2021; 11:723513.

PMID: 34354957 PMC: 8329720. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.723513.


References
1.
Gondim J, Almeida J, Albuquerque L, Gomes E, Schops M . Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach. World Neurosurg. 2013; 82(1-2):e281-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.028. View

2.
McLaughlin N, Eisenberg A, Cohan P, Chaloner C, Kelly D . Value of endoscopy for maximizing tumor removal in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2012; 118(3):613-20. DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS112020. View

3.
Matsuyama J, Kawase T, Yoshida K, Hasegawa M, Hirose Y, Nagahisa S . Management of large and giant pituitary adenomas with suprasellar extensions. Asian J Neurosurg. 2011; 5(1):48-53. PMC: 3198654. View

4.
Agrawal A, Cincu R, Goel A . Current concepts and controversies in the management of non-functioning giant pituitary macroadenomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007; 109(8):645-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.06.007. View

5.
Ferreri A, Garrido S, Markarian M, Yanez A . Relationship between the development of diaphragma sellae and the morphology of the sella turcica and its content. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992; 14(3):233-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01794946. View