» Articles » PMID: 30339580

Outcome Measures in Interventions That Enhance Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration, and Exclusivity: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Nursing
Date 2018 Oct 20
PMID 30339580
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this review was to examine outcome measures used in interventions focusing on enhancement of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity.

Methods: A literature search guided by search terms on outcome measures of breastfeeding interventions was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, & PsycINFO databases on publications between 2006 and 2017.

Results: Nine studies were included in this review, using PRISMA guidelines. Rates of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity were measured during specific points in time. Data collection methods involve interviews, self-report, observations, and/or feeding logs. Although breastfeeding types (exclusive breastfeeding, predominant breastfeeding, and complementary breastfeeding) were measured, methods of infant feeding (breastfeeding and bottle feeding) were rarely assessed, ignoring significant mediators or moderators of breastfeeding.

Conclusions: There were methodological limitations to the reviewed studies: (1) a 24-hour recall bias, (2) misclassification of breastfeeding categories, (3) lack of consistency in breastfeeding definitions, and (4) few reports of the reason for breastfeeding discontinuation. Future studies should focus on the modifiable cause of the problem: outcome measures attributed to the targets of the intervention, followed by breastfeeding initiation, duration, and/or exclusivity.

Citing Articles

Teleintervention's effects on breastfeeding in low-income women in high income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Corkery-Hayward M, Talaei M Int Breastfeed J. 2024; 19(1):26.

PMID: 38615079 PMC: 11015560. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-024-00631-2.


Comparative Assessment of Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates From 24-Hour Recall and Since Birth Methods in Southwestern Pennsylvania Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Isiguzo C, Documet P, Demirci J, Youk A, Mendez G, Davis E J Hum Lact. 2023; 39(4):584-594.

PMID: 37675868 PMC: 11219032. DOI: 10.1177/08903344231193734.


Breastfeeding Associations with Childhood Obesity and Body Composition: Findings from a Racially Diverse Maternal-Child Cohort.

Hildebrand J, Ferguson P, Sciscione A, Grobman W, Newman R, Tita A Child Obes. 2021; 18(3):178-187.

PMID: 34669515 PMC: 8982114. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2021.0138.

References
1.
Wood N, Woods N, Blackburn S, Sanders E . Interventions that Enhance Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration, and Exclusivity: A Systematic Review. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2016; 41(5):299-307. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000264. View

2.
Mattar C, Chong Y, Chan Y, Chew A, Tan P, Chan Y . Simple antenatal preparation to improve breastfeeding practice: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249613.15466.26. View

3.
Giglia R, Cox K, Zhao Y, Binns C . Exclusive breastfeeding increased by an internet intervention. Breastfeed Med. 2014; 10(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0093. View

4.
Wood N, Sanders E . Mothers With Perceived Insufficient Milk: Preliminary Evidence of Home Interventions to Boost Mother-Infant Interactions. West J Nurs Res. 2017; 40(8):1184-1202. DOI: 10.1177/0193945916687552. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(10):1006-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. View