» Articles » PMID: 30335792

Effect of Online Hemodiafiltration Compared with Hemodialysis on Quality of Life in Patients with ESRD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Oct 19
PMID 30335792
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is related to high morbidity, mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. While hemodialysis (HD) is the current life-saving standard of treatment for patients with ESRD, their quality of life (QoL) remains far from desirable. Online HDF (OL-HDF), due to its convenience, could improve the QoL of patients with ESRD, however, this remains uncertain.

Objective: We aimed to assess the body of evidence of OL-HDF compared to HD regarding QoL in patients with ESRD.

Methods: We comprehensively searched in multiple data bases from their inception to February 2018. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate appraised the quality and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated, in patients with ESRD and HD or OL-HDF, QoL (Short Form Health Survey with 36 questions (SF-36) with physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) as well as scores about social activity, fatigue, and emotion). A meta-analysis of each outcome of interest was performed using a random-effects model.

Results: Six moderate quality RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs including a total of 1,209 patients showed that OL-HDF was associated with a lower yet non-significant score of PCS: MD (mean difference) -0.77 (95% CI -1.94 to 0.41, p = 0.20), and MCS: MD -1.25 (95% CI -3.10 to 0.59, p = 0.18); indicating a poorer QoL in patients on OL-HDF. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs including a total of 845 patients showed OL-HDF was associated with a significant increase in the score of social activity compared to HD: SMD (standardized mean difference): 1.95 (95% CI 0.05 to 3.86, p = 0.04), indicating a better QoL in patients on OL-HDF; but regarding fatigue and emotion, there was no significant improvement when compared to HD by meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (133 patients).

Conclusions: The body of evidence suggests that OL-HDF does not improve QoL in patients with ESRD when compared to HD.

Citing Articles

Has the CONVINCE trial convinced the nephrology and dialysis community?.

Moury J, Nendumba G, Robert A, Hauquiert B, Vornicu O, Blackman S Ann Transl Med. 2024; 12(5):99.

PMID: 39507453 PMC: 11534750. DOI: 10.21037/atm-24-50.


Effect of hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis on mortality of patients with end-stage kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

Zhu Y, Li J, Lu H, Shi Z, Wang X BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):372.

PMID: 39438899 PMC: 11520167. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03810-9.


Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Dialysis Patients: A Challenging but Rewarding Path.

Guo L, Ji Y, Sun T, Liu Y, Jiang C, Wang G Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(6):232.

PMID: 39076321 PMC: 11270084. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2506232.


Effect of online hemodiafiltration on quality of life, fatigue and recovery time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bossola M, Mariani I, Antocicco M, Pepe G, Di Stasio E J Artif Organs. 2024; 28(1):15-24.

PMID: 39066846 PMC: 11832692. DOI: 10.1007/s10047-024-01459-7.


Actioning the findings of hard endpoint clinical trials as they emerge in the realm of chronic kidney disease care: a review and a call to action.

Strippoli G, Green S Clin Kidney J. 2024; 17(2):sfae035.

PMID: 38425707 PMC: 10903297. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae035.


References
1.
Karkar A, Abdelrahman M, Locatelli F . A Randomized Trial on Health-Related Patient Satisfaction Level with High-Efficiency Online Hemodiafiltration versus High-Flux Dialysis. Blood Purif. 2015; 40(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1159/000381255. View

2.
Akizawa T, Koiwa F . Clinical Expectation of Online Hemodiafiltration: A Japanese Perspective. Blood Purif. 2015; 40 Suppl 1:12-6. DOI: 10.1159/000437405. View

3.
Movilli E, Camerini C, Gaggia P, Poiatti P, Pola A, Viola B . Effect of post-dilutional on-line haemodiafiltration on serum calcium, phosphate and parathyroid hormone concentrations in uraemic patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26(12):4032-7. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr179. View

4.
Canaud B, Bragg-Gresham J, Marshall M, Desmeules S, Gillespie B, Depner T . Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006; 69(11):2087-93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000447. View

5.
Sichart J, Moeller S . Utilization of hemodiafiltration as treatment modality in renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease patients--a global perspective. Contrib Nephrol. 2011; 175:163-169. DOI: 10.1159/000333634. View