» Articles » PMID: 30334988

The Predictability of Dynamic Preload Indices Depends on the Volume of Fluid Challenge: A Prospective Observational Study in the Operating Theater

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Oct 19
PMID 30334988
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was designed to assess the association between volume of fluid challenge (FC) and predictability of respiratory variation of stroke volume (ΔrespSV) in the operating theater.Patients undergoing intermediate/high-risk surgery and monitored by esophageal Doppler monitoring (EDM) were prospectively included. All patients were under general anesthesia and mechanically ventilated. Exclusion criteria were frequent ectopic beats or preoperative arrhythmia, right ventricular failure, and spontaneous breathing. Hemodynamic parameters and esophageal Doppler indices (SV, cardiac output, ΔrespSV) were collected before, after infusion of 250 mL, and after infusion of 500 mL of crystalloid solution. Responders were defined by a >15% increase of stroke volume after FC at each step.After infusion of a 250 mL FC, 41 patients (32%) were classified as fluid responders (R250). After infusion of a 500 mL FC, 80 patients (63%) were classified as fluid responders (R500). The predictability of ΔrespSV was fair with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.86, P < .001) to predict fluid responsiveness with a 250 mL FC. With an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.97, P < .0001), ΔrespSV presented an excellent ability to predict fluid responsiveness with a 500-mL FC.Predictability of ΔrespSV changed with the volume of fluid infused to assess fluid responsiveness. The accuracy of ΔrespSV was higher with 500 mL than with 250 mL. Bedside studies evaluating the predictability of dynamic preload indices should define fluid responsiveness as a >15% increase of SV in response to a 500-mL FC.

Citing Articles

Fluid expansion improve ventriculo-arterial coupling in preload-dependent patients: a prospective observational study.

Huette P, Abou-Arab O, Longrois D, Guinot P BMC Anesthesiol. 2020; 20(1):171.

PMID: 32680470 PMC: 7366889. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01087-7.

References
1.
Guinot P, Urbina B, de Broca B, Bernard E, Dupont H, Lorne E . Predictability of the respiratory variation of stroke volume varies according to the definition of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112(3):580-1. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu031. View

2.
Vaupshas H, Levy M . Distribution of saline following acute volume loading: postural effects. Clin Invest Med. 1990; 13(4):165-77. View

3.
Ansari B, Zochios V, Falter F, Klein A . Physiological controversies and methods used to determine fluid responsiveness: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2015; 71(1):94-105. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13246. View

4.
Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A . Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103(3):346-51. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep200. View

5.
Miki K, Itoh T, Nose H, Tanaka Y, Morimoto T . Estimation of plasma volume from hematocrit and plasma oncotic pressure during volume expansion in dogs. Jpn J Physiol. 1987; 37(4):687-98. DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.37.687. View