» Articles » PMID: 30334907

Duration and Time Trends in Hospital Stay for Very Preterm Infants Differ Across European Regions

Abstract

Objectives: To compare duration and changes over time in length of hospital stay for very preterm and extremely preterm infants in 10 European regions.

Design: Two area-based cohort studies from the same regions in 2003 and 2011/2012.

Setting: Ten regions from nine European countries.

Patients: Infants born between 22 + 0 and 31 + 6 weeks of gestational age and surviving to discharge (Models of Organising Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births cohort in 2003, n = 4,011 and Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe cohort in 2011/2012, n = 4,336).

Interventions: Observational study, no intervention.

Measurements And Main Results: Maternal and infant characteristics were abstracted from medical records using a common protocol and length of stay until discharge was adjusted for case-mix using negative binomial regression. Mean length of stay was 63.6 days in 2003 and varied from 52.4 to 76.5 days across regions. In 2011/2012, mean length of stay was 63.1 days, with a narrower regional range (54.0-70.1). Low gestational age, small for gestational age, low 5-minute Apgar score, surfactant administration, any surgery, and severe neonatal morbidities increased length of stay. Infant characteristics explained some of the differences between regions and over time, but large variations remained after adjustment. In 2011/2012, mean adjusted length of stay ranged from less than 54 days in the Northern region of the United Kingdom and Wielkopolska, Poland to over 67 days in the Ile-de-France region of France and the Eastern region of the Netherlands. No systematic decrease in very preterm length of stay was observed over time after adjustment for patient case-mix.

Conclusions: A better understanding of the discharge criteria and care practices that contribute to the wide differences in very preterm length of stay across European regions could inform policies to optimize discharge decisions in terms of infant outcomes and health system costs.

Citing Articles

Clinical sequelae of gut microbiome development and disruption in hospitalized preterm infants.

Thanert R, Schwartz D, Keen E, Hall-Moore C, Wang B, Shaikh N Cell Host Microbe. 2024; 32(10):1822-1837.e5.

PMID: 39197454 PMC: 11466706. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2024.07.027.


Morbidity and trends in length of hospitalisation of very and extremely preterm infants born between 2008 and 2021 in the Netherlands: a cohort study.

de Bijl-Marcus K, Benders M, Dudink J, Ahaus K, Kahlmann M, Groenendaal F BMJ Open. 2024; 14(6):e078842.

PMID: 38834326 PMC: 11163635. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078842.


When should a premature neonate (24-35 weeks) be discharged? five-year experience from a single-center neonatal intensive care unit in Türkiye.

Orman A, Celik Y, Erdogan S Turk J Med Sci. 2024; 53(5):1244-1253.

PMID: 38813027 PMC: 10763764. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5690.


Length of hospital stay and factors associated with very-low-birth-weight preterm neonates surviving to discharge a cross-sectional study, 2022.

Mehretie Y, Amare A, Getnet G, Mekonnen B BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):80.

PMID: 38279136 PMC: 10811810. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04532-5.


Changes in neonatal morbidity, neonatal care practices, and length of hospital stay of surviving infants born very preterm in the Netherlands in the 1980s and in the 2000s: a comparison analysis with identical characteristics definitions.

Sexty R, van der Pal S, Reijneveld S, Wolke D, Luchters G, Bakker L BMC Pediatr. 2023; 23(1):554.

PMID: 37925410 PMC: 10625206. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04354-x.


References
1.
Zeitlin J, Manktelow B, Piedvache A, Cuttini M, Boyle E, van Heijst A . Use of evidence based practices to improve survival without severe morbidity for very preterm infants: results from the EPICE population based cohort. BMJ. 2016; 354:i2976. PMC: 4933797. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2976. View

2.
Altman M, Vanpee M, Cnattingius S, Norman M . Moderately preterm infants and determinants of length of hospital stay. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009; 94(6):F414-8. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.153668. View

3.
Fatttore G, Numerato D, Peltola M, Banks H, Graziani R, Heijink R . Variations and Determinants of Mortality and Length of Stay of Very Low Birth Weight and Very Low for Gestational Age Infants in Seven European Countries. Health Econ. 2015; 24 Suppl 2:65-87. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3261. View

4.
Papile L, BURSTEIN J, Burstein R, KOFFLER H . Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr. 1978; 92(4):529-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0. View

5.
Abler S, Verde P, Stannigel H, Mayatepek E, Hoehn T . Effect of the introduction of diagnosis related group systems on the distribution of admission weights in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010; 96(3):F186-9. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.192500. View