» Articles » PMID: 30333804

Insights Into Arsenite and Arsenate Uptake Pathways Using a Whole Cell Biosensor

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2018 Oct 19
PMID 30333804
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite its high toxicity and widespread occurrence in many parts of the world, arsenic (As) concentrations in decentralized water supplies such as domestic wells remain often unquantified. One limitation to effective monitoring is the high cost and lack of portability of current arsenic speciation techniques. Here, we present an arsenic biosensor assay capable of quantifying and determining the bioavailable fraction of arsenic species at environmentally relevant concentrations. First, we found that inorganic phosphate, a buffering agent and nutrient commonly found in most bioassay exposure media, was in fact limiting As(V) uptake, possibly explaining the variability in As(V) detection reported so far. Second, we show that the nature of the carbon source used in the bioassay differentially affects the response of the biosensor to As(III). Finally, our data support the existence of non-specific reduction pathways (non- encoded) that are responsible for the reduction of As(V) to As(III), allowing its detection by the biosensor. To validate our laboratory approach using field samples, we performed As(III) and As(V) standard additions on natural water samples collected from 17 lakes surrounding Giant Mine in Yellowknife (NWT), Canada. We found that legacy arsenic contamination in these lake water samples was accurately quantified by the biosensor. Interestingly, bioavailability of freshly added standards showed signs of matrix interference, indicative of dynamic interactions between As(III), As(V) and environmental constituents that have yet to be identified. Our results point toward dissolved organic carbon as possibly controlling these interactions, thus altering As bioavailability.

Citing Articles

Research Progress in Fluorescent Probes for Arsenic Species.

Qiu Y, Yu S, Li L Molecules. 2022; 27(23).

PMID: 36500589 PMC: 9740406. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27238497.


Time-Dependent Biosensor Fluorescence as a Measure of Bacterial Arsenic Uptake Kinetics and Its Inhibition by Dissolved Organic Matter.

Yoon H, Giometto A, Pothier M, Zhang X, Poulain A, Reid M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022; 88(16):e0089122.

PMID: 35913152 PMC: 9397108. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00891-22.


Golden Gate Assembly of Aerobic and Anaerobic Microbial Bioreporters.

Hinz A, Stenzler B, Poulain A Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021; 88(1):e0148521.

PMID: 34705553 PMC: 8752160. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01485-21.


Genomic Insight of FL18 Isolated From an Arsenic-Rich Hot Spring.

Aulitto M, Gallo G, Puopolo R, Mormone A, Limauro D, Contursi P Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:639697.

PMID: 33897644 PMC: 8060452. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.639697.

References
1.
Chrysostomou C, Quandt E, Marshall N, Stone E, Georgiou G . An alternate pathway of arsenate resistance in E. coli mediated by the glutathione S-transferase GstB. ACS Chem Biol. 2014; 10(3):875-82. PMC: 4372098. DOI: 10.1021/cb500755j. View

2.
Cortes-Salazar F, Beggah S, van der Meer J, Girault H . Electrochemical As(III) whole-cell based biochip sensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013; 47:237-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.03.011. View

3.
Cai L, Rensing C, Li X, Wang G . Novel gene clusters involved in arsenite oxidation and resistance in two arsenite oxidizers: Achromobacter sp. SY8 and Pseudomonas sp. TS44. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 83(4):715-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-1929-4. View

4.
Zhang Y, Monchy S, Greenberg B, Mergeay M, Gang O, Taghavi S . ArsR arsenic-resistance regulatory protein from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2009; 96(2):161-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-009-9313-z. View

5.
Blattner F, Plunkett 3rd G, Bloch C, Perna N, Burland V, Riley M . The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997; 277(5331):1453-62. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. View