» Articles » PMID: 30332471

Generation and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies That Recognize Human and Murine Supervillin Protein Isoforms

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Oct 18
PMID 30332471
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Supervillin isoforms have been implicated in cell proliferation, actin filament-based motile processes, vesicle trafficking, and signal transduction. However, an understanding of the roles of these proteins in cancer metastasis and physiological processes has been limited by the difficulty of obtaining specific antibodies against these highly conserved membrane-associated proteins. To facilitate research into the biological functions of supervillin, monoclonal antibodies were generated against the bacterially expressed human supervillin N-terminus. Two chimeric monoclonal antibodies with rabbit Fc domains (clones 1E2/CPTC-SVIL-1; 4A8/CPTC-SVIL-2) and two mouse monoclonal antibodies (clones 5A8/CPTC-SVIL-3; 5G3/CPTC-SVIL-4) were characterized with respect to their binding sites, affinities, and for efficacy in immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence microscopy and immunohistochemical staining. Two antibodies (1E2, 5G3) recognize a sequence found only in primate supervillins, whereas the other two antibodies (4A8, 5A8) are specific for a more broadly conserved conformational epitope(s). All antibodies function in immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation and in immunofluorescence microscopy under the fixation conditions identified here. We also show that the 5A8 antibody works on immunohistological sections. These antibodies should provide useful tools for the study of mammalian supervillins.

Citing Articles

Quantifying antibody binding: techniques and therapeutic implications.

Lodge J, Kajtar L, Duxbury R, Hall D, Burley G, Cordy J MAbs. 2025; 17(1):2459795.

PMID: 39957177 PMC: 11834528. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2459795.


Novel γ-sarcoglycan interactors in murine muscle membranes.

Smith T, Vasilakos G, Shaffer S, Puglise J, Chou C, Barton E Skelet Muscle. 2022; 12(1):2.

PMID: 35065666 PMC: 8783446. DOI: 10.1186/s13395-021-00285-2.


Subcellular proteomics.

Christopher J, Stadler C, Martin C, Morgenstern M, Pan Y, Betsinger C Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021; 1.

PMID: 34549195 PMC: 8451152. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00029-y.

References
1.
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson T, Karplus K, Li W . Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011; 7:539. PMC: 3261699. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. View

2.
Linder S, Wiesner C, Himmel M . Degrading devices: invadosomes in proteolytic cell invasion. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011; 27:185-211. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154216. View

3.
Uhart M, Bustos D . Protein intrinsic disorder and network connectivity. The case of 14-3-3 proteins. Front Genet. 2014; 5:10. PMC: 3909831. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00010. View

4.
Laemmli U . Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227(5259):680-5. DOI: 10.1038/227680a0. View

5.
Chen Y, Takizawa N, Crowley J, Oh S, Gatto C, Kambara T . F-actin and myosin II binding domains in supervillin. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(46):46094-106. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M305311200. View