» Articles » PMID: 30327916

Characterization of Megapouch in Patients with Restorative Proctocolectomy

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Oct 18
PMID 30327916
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Megapouch is a rare functional complication of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis characterized by pouch ± small bowel dilatation with no evidence of obstruction on endoscopy and imaging. Little is known about clinical characteristics and outcomes of this entity.

Methods: We included all patients diagnosed with megapouch at our institution, identified from a pouch database. Data on baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes were documented and analyzed from electronic medical records. Appropriate statistical measures were used. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Twenty-three patients with megapouch were identified. The mean age was 40.7 years; 95.6% had underlying ulcerative colitis; most common indication for colectomy was medically refractory disease (56.5%). Abdominal pain (82.6%) and bloating (52.2%) were most common presenting symptoms. Most common finding on pouchoscopy was pouch dilatation (81.8%), while barium or gastrografin enemas and MRI/CT mostly revealed dilatation of pouch and/or small bowel. Fourteen (66.7%) patients required some forms of surgery-six patients required pouch excision and three required either pouch redo or revision. Rates of pouch failure and IBD-related 1-year hospitalization were higher among patients managed surgically versus those managed medically (p = 0.007 and 0.024, respectively), while need for escalation of IBD-therapy was comparable between the groups (p = 0.133). No deaths were reported and no patient had recurrence of megapouch. IPAA revision or redo did not lead to more IBD-related morbidity.

Conclusions: Majority of our patients with megapouch required surgery. In selected patients, redo pouch offered cure. Rates of pouch failure and IBD-related 1-year hospitalization were higher among patients managed surgically.

Citing Articles

Clinical approach to patients with an ileal pouch.

Maspero M, Hull T Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 48(9):2918-2929.

PMID: 37005915 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03888-z.

References
1.
Khanna R, Shen B . Adverse metabolic sequelae following restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012; 8(5):322-6. PMC: 3424428. View

2.
Fonkalsrud E . Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches. Ann Surg. 1999; 229(2):197-204. PMC: 1191631. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00006. View

3.
Parks A, Nicholls R . Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978; 2(6130):85-8. PMC: 1605901. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6130.85. View

4.
Shen B, Lashner B . Diagnosis and treatment of ileal pouch diseases in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2006; 9(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1007/s11938-006-0019-2. View

5.
Makkar R, Graff L, Bharadwaj S, Lopez R, Shen B . Psychological Factors in Irritable Pouch Syndrome and Other Pouch Disorders. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015; 21(12):2815-24. DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000552. View