» Articles » PMID: 30325992

Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Importance: The clinical implications of adding plasma-based circulating tumor DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) to tissue NGS for targetable mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been formally assessed.

Objective: To determine whether plasma NGS testing was associated with improved mutation detection and enhanced delivery of personalized therapy in a real-world clinical setting.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This prospective cohort study enrolled 323 patients with metastatic NSCLC who had plasma testing ordered as part of routine clinical management. Plasma NGS was performed using a 73-gene commercial platform. Patients were enrolled at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from April 1, 2016, through January 2, 2018. The database was locked for follow-up and analyses on January 2, 2018, with a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-21 months).

Main Outcomes And Measures: The number of patients with targetable alterations detected with plasma and tissue NGS; the association between the allele fractions (AFs) of mutations detected in tissue and plasma; and the association of response rate with the plasma AF of the targeted mutations.

Results: Among the 323 patients with NSCLC (60.1% female; median age, 65 years [range, 33-93 years]), therapeutically targetable mutations were detected in EGFR, ALK, MET, BRCA1, ROS1, RET, ERBB2, or BRAF for 113 (35.0%) overall. Ninety-four patients (29.1%) had plasma testing only at the discretion of the treating physician or patient preference. Among the 94 patients with plasma testing alone, 31 (33.0%) had a therapeutically targetable mutation detected, thus obviating the need for an invasive biopsy. Among the remaining 229 patients who had concurrent plasma and tissue NGS or were unable to have tissue NGS, a therapeutically targetable mutation was detected in tissue alone for 47 patients (20.5%), whereas the addition of plasma testing increased this number to 82 (35.8%). Thirty-six of 42 patients (85.7%) who received a targeted therapy based on the plasma result achieved a complete or a partial response or stable disease. The plasma-based targeted mutation AF had no correlation with depth of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response (r = -0.121; P = .45).

Conclusions And Relevance: Integration of plasma NGS testing into the routine management of stage IV NSCLC demonstrates a marked increase of the detection of therapeutically targetable mutations and improved delivery of molecularly guided therapy.

Citing Articles

Utilizing ctDNA to discover mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in patients with metastatic NSCLC: towards more informative trials.

Ernst S, Aldea M, von der Thusen J, de Langen A, Smit E, Paats M Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025; .

PMID: 40087401 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-025-01011-3.


"Plasma-first" approach for molecular genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review.

Garcia-Pardo M, Leighl N J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 2:100123.

PMID: 40028483 PMC: 11863935. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100123.


Harnessing liquid biopsies: Exosomes and ctDNA as minimally invasive biomarkers for precision cancer medicine.

Bamodu O, Chung C, Pisanic 2nd T J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 2:100126.

PMID: 40028482 PMC: 11863985. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100126.


Moving liquid biopsies to the Front-line of lung cancer treatment decisions.

Raez L, Carracedo C, Rosas D, Alvarez A J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 1:100006.

PMID: 40027286 PMC: 11863809. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100006.


Liquid biopsy into the clinics: Current evidence and future perspectives.

Boukovala M, Westphalen C, Probst V J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 4:100146.

PMID: 40027149 PMC: 11863819. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100146.


References
1.
Punnoose E, Atwal S, Liu W, Raja R, Fine B, Hughes B . Evaluation of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer: association with clinical endpoints in a phase II clinical trial of pertuzumab and erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(8):2391-401. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3148. View

2.
Mok T, Kim S, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Yang J, Ahn M . Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to First-Line Gefitinib (IMPRESS): Overall Survival and Biomarker Analyses. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(36):4027-4034. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.9250. View

3.
Solomon B, Mok T, Kim D, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T . First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2167-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440. View

4.
Newman A, Bratman S, To J, Wynne J, Eclov N, Modlin L . An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage. Nat Med. 2014; 20(5):548-54. PMC: 4016134. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3519. View

5.
Hellmann M, Ciuleanu T, Pluzanski A, Lee J, Otterson G, Audigier-Valette C . Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(22):2093-2104. PMC: 7193684. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801946. View