» Articles » PMID: 30325061

The Influence of Rotator Cuff Tears on Muscle and Joint-contact Loading After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Orthop Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Oct 17
PMID 30325061
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are known to affect clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aimed to use computational modelling to quantify the effect of rotator cuff tear severity on muscle and joint forces after RSA, as well as stresses at the glenosphere, base-plate, fixation screws, scapula, and humeral components. A multi-body musculoskeletal model of the glenohumeral joint was developed comprising the scapula, humerus and nine major upper limb muscles. Simulations of abduction and flexion after RSA were performed in the case of the intact rotator cuff and tears to (i) supraspinatus; (ii) supraspinatus and infraspinatus, and (iii) supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis. The intact and supraspinatus deficient rotator cuff resulted in the largest calculated muscle forces, glenohumeral joint contact forces and implant stresses. Peak glenohumeral joint forces during flexion were lower than those during abduction in all cases; however, substantially more posterior joint shear force was generated during flexion than abduction. A tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus reduced glenohumeral joint forces by a factor of 8.7 during abduction (603.1 N) and 7.1 during flexion (520.7 N) compared to those in the supraspinatus deficient shoulder. RSA with an intact or supraspinatus deficient rotator cuff produces large glenohumeral joint forces that may increase base-plate failure risk, particularly during flexion when posterior shear forces are largest. Infraspinatus tears after RSA greatly reduce glenohumeral joint compression and may ultimately reduce joint stability. Future research ought to focus on experimental validation of subject-specific muscle recruitment strategies and joint loading after RSA. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Citing Articles

Finite element analysis part 2 of 2: Glenohumeral bone stress distribution depends on implant configuration for anatomic and reverse stemless shoulder implants.

Housset V, Srikumaran U, Daudet J, Fradet L, Bianco R, Nourissat G J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e70001.

PMID: 39301206 PMC: 11411269. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70001.


Finite element analysis part 1 of 2: Influence of short stem implant polyethylene configuration on glenohumeral joint biomechanics.

Nourissat G, Housset V, Daudet J, Fradet L, Bianco R, Srikumaran U J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e70000.

PMID: 39301205 PMC: 11411371. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70000.


Effect of subscapularis repair on joint contact forces based on degree of posterior-superior rotator cuff tear severity in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Lee D, Lee J, Oh J, Shin C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1229646.

PMID: 38130822 PMC: 10733495. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1229646.


Impact of prior anterior instability on shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review.

Vopat M, Peebles A, Hanson J, Powell S, Mologne M, Jildeh T JSES Int. 2022; 6(6):874-883.

PMID: 36353431 PMC: 9637700. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.012.


Insurance status is not a predictor of rotator cuff tear magnitude.

Murali S, Elphingstone J, Paul K, Messner M, Frazier M, Narducci C JSES Int. 2022; 6(5):815-819.

PMID: 36081697 PMC: 9446165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.014.