» Articles » PMID: 30324177

Availability of Researcher-led EHealth Tools for Pain Assessment and Management: Barriers, Facilitators, Costs, and Design

Overview
Journal Pain Rep
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Date 2018 Oct 17
PMID 30324177
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Numerous eHealth tools for pain assessment and management have been developed and evaluated with promising results regarding psychometric properties, efficacy, and effectiveness. Although considerable resources are spent on developing and evaluating these tools with the aim of increasing access to care, current evidence suggests they are not made available to end users, reducing their impact and creating potential research waste.

Methods: This study consisted of 2 components: (1) a systematic review of eHealth tools for pediatric pain assessment and/or management published in the past 10 years, and (2) an online survey, completed by the authors of identified tools, of tool availability, perceived barriers or facilitators to availability, grant funding used, and a validated measure of user-centeredness of the design process (UCD-11).

Results: Ninety articles (0.86% of citations screened) describing 53 tools met inclusion criteria. Twenty-six survey responses were completed (49.06%), 13 of which (50.00%) described available tools. Commonly endorsed facilitators of tool availability included researchers' beliefs in tool benefits to the target population and research community; barriers included lack of infrastructure and time. The average cost of each unavailable tool was $314,425.31 USD ($3,144,253.06 USD total, n = 10). Authors of available tools were more likely to have followed user-centered design principles and reported higher total funding.

Conclusion: Systemic changes to academic and funding structures could better support eHealth tool availability and may reduce potential for research waste. User-centered design and implementation science methods could improve the availability of eHealth tools and should be further explored in future studies.

Citing Articles

Developing and implementing a nurse-delivered and a web-based dyadic psychoeducational program for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: sharing experiences from a three-arm international randomized controlled trial (DIAdIC).

De Vleminck A, Van Goethem V, Dierickx S, Matthys O, Beernaert K, Gronvold M Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025; 19:26323524241310458.

PMID: 39968193 PMC: 11833810. DOI: 10.1177/26323524241310458.


Expanding a Behavioral View on Digital Health Access: Drivers and Strategies to Promote Equity.

Kepper M, Fowler L, Kusters I, Davis J, Baqer M, Sagui-Henson S J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51355.

PMID: 39088246 PMC: 11327633. DOI: 10.2196/51355.


Patient and public involvement in the development of the digital tool MyBoT to support communication between young people with a chronic condition and care providers.

van Schelven F, van Weele M, van der Meulen E, Wessels E, Boeije H Health Expect. 2024; 27(2):e14003.

PMID: 38444291 PMC: 10915502. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14003.


Co-designing clinical trials alongside youth with chronic pain.

Zaslawski Z, Dib K, Tsang V, Orr S, Birnie K, Lowthian T Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023; 5(4):142-154.

PMID: 38149217 PMC: 10749402. DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12105.


"Making Data the Drug": A Pragmatic Pilot Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial of Data Visualization as an Intervention for Pediatric Chronic Pain.

Boerner K, Desai U, Luu J, Maclean K, Munzner T, Foladare H Children (Basel). 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37628354 PMC: 10452969. DOI: 10.3390/children10081355.


References
1.
Mott J, Bucolo S, Cuttle L, Mill J, Hilder M, Miller K . The efficacy of an augmented virtual reality system to alleviate pain in children undergoing burns dressing changes: a randomised controlled trial. Burns. 2008; 34(6):803-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.10.010. View

2.
Stinson J, Toomey P, Stevens B, Kagan S, Duffy C, Huber A . Asking the experts: exploring the self-management needs of adolescents with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(1):65-72. DOI: 10.1002/art.23244. View

3.
Lelieveld O, Armbrust W, Geertzen J, de Graaf I, Van Leeuwen M, Sauer P . Promoting physical activity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis through an internet-based program: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010; 62(5):697-703. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20085. View

4.
Wolpin S, Stewart M . A deliberate and rigorous approach to development of patient-centered technologies. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011; 27(3):183-91. PMC: 3189856. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2011.04.003. View

5.
Stinson J, Ahola Kohut S, Forgeron P, Amaria K, Bell M, Kaufman M . The iPeer2Peer Program: a pilot randomized controlled trial in adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016; 14(1):48. PMC: 5010693. DOI: 10.1186/s12969-016-0108-2. View