» Articles » PMID: 30323844

Consistent Differences in Foraging Behavior in 2 Sympatric Harvester Ant Species May Facilitate Coexistence

Overview
Journal Curr Zool
Date 2018 Oct 17
PMID 30323844
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The co-occurrence of 2 similar species depends on their ability to occupy different ecological niches. Here, we compared the consistency of different aspects of foraging behavior in 2 co-occurring harvester ant species ( and ), under field conditions. The 2 species are active concomitantly and display a similar diet, but features smaller colonies, larger workers on average, and a broader range of foraging strategies than . We characterized the flora in the 2 species' natural habitat, and detected a nesting preference by for more open, vegetation-free microhabitats than those preferred by . Next, we tested the food preference of foraging colonies by presenting 3 non-native seed types. was more selective in its food choice. Colonies were then offered 1 type of seeds over 3 days in different spatial arrangements from the nest entrance (e.g., a seed plate close to the nest entrance, a seed plate blocked by an obstacle, or 3 plates placed at increasing distances from the nest entrance). While both species were consistent in their foraging behavior, expressed as seed collection, under different treatments over time, was more consistent than . These differences between the species may be explained by their different colony size, worker size, and range of foraging strategies, among other factors. We suggest that the differences in foraging, such as in food preference and behavioral consistency while foraging, could contribute to the co-occurrence of these 2 species in a similar habitat.

Citing Articles

The combined role of visual and olfactory cues in foraging by ants in laboratory mazes.

Gilad T, Bahar O, Hasan M, Bar A, Subach A, Scharf I Curr Zool. 2023; 69(4):401-408.

PMID: 37614920 PMC: 10443614. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac058.


Egg-Laying Behavior of Ants Is Influenced More Strongly by Temperature Than Daylength.

Bar A, Shalev L, Scharf I Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36552224 PMC: 9774527. DOI: 10.3390/biology11121714.


Leg or antenna injury in ants impairs survival but does not hinder searching for food.

Gilad T, Dorfman A, Subach A, Scharf I Curr Zool. 2022; 68(4):441-450.

PMID: 36090143 PMC: 9450180. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab027.


Desert Ants Learn to Avoid Pitfall Traps While Foraging.

Bar A, Marom C, Zorin N, Gilad T, Subach A, Foitzik S Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(6).

PMID: 35741418 PMC: 9219994. DOI: 10.3390/biology11060897.


The value of spatial experience and group size for ant colonies in direct competition.

Subach A, Avidov B, Dorfman A, Bega D, Gilad T, Kvetny M Insect Sci. 2022; 30(1):241-250.

PMID: 35696548 PMC: 10084317. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.13090.


References
1.
Heller R . On optimal diet in a patchy environment. Theor Popul Biol. 1980; 17(2):201-14. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(80)90006-4. View

2.
Albrecht M, Gotelli N . Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia. 2017; 126(1):134-141. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000494. View

3.
Cerda X, Retana J, Manzaneda A . The role of competition by dominants and temperature in the foraging of subordinate species in Mediterranean ant communities. Oecologia. 2017; 117(3):404-412. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050674. View

4.
Pinter-Wollman N, Gordon D, Holmes S . Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies. Behav Ecol. 2012; 23(5):1022-1029. PMC: 3431114. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars066. View

5.
Avgar T, Giladi I, Nathan R . Linking traits of foraging animals to spatial patterns of plants: social and solitary ants generate opposing patterns of surviving seeds. Ecol Lett. 2007; 11(3):224-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01140.x. View