LABA/LAMA Fixed-dose Combinations in Patients with COPD: a Systematic Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence for long-acting β-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in the treatment of COPD.
Materials And Methods: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials published in English up to September 2017 of LABA/LAMA FDCs vs LABA or LAMA or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) FDCs in COPD patients was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Outcomes including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV), Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) scores, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, exacerbations, exercise tolerance (endurance time [ET]), inspiratory capacity (IC), and rescue medication use were evaluated.
Results: In total, 27 studies were included in the review. LABA/LAMA FDCs significantly improved lung function (FEV) at 12 weeks compared with LABA or LAMA or LABA/ICS. These effects were maintained over time. Significant improvements with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs each evaluated comparator were also observed in TDI and SGRQ scores, even if significant differences between different LABA/LAMA FDCs were detected. Only the LABA/LAMA FDC indacaterol/glycopyrronium has shown superiority vs LAMA and LABA/ICS for reducing exacerbation rates, while olodaterol/tiotropium and indacaterol/glycopyrronium have been shown to improve ET and IC vs the active comparators. Rescue medication use was significantly reduced by LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the evaluated comparators. LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe, with no increase in the risk of adverse events with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the monocomponents.
Conclusion: Evidence supporting the efficacy of LABA/LAMA FDCs for COPD is heterogeneous, particularly for TDI and SGRQ scores, exacerbation rates, ET, and IC. So far, indacaterol/glycopyrronium is the LABA/LAMA FDC that has the strongest evidence for superiority vs LABA, LAMA, and LABA/ICS FDCs across the evaluated outcomes. LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe; however, more data should be collected in a real-world setting to confirm their safety.
Choi K, Kim H, Rhee C, Yoo K, Park Y, Kim Y Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:1661-1671.
PMID: 39050737 PMC: 11268597. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S448492.
Pelaia C, Ferrante Bannera A, Rotundo F, Tropea F, Armentaro G, Maglio A Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023; 18:995-1002.
PMID: 37260547 PMC: 10228585. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S407238.
Prabhudesai P, Singh B, Agrawal G, Singh A, Jadhav A, Patil S Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e34825.
PMID: 36919064 PMC: 10008380. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34825.
Salvi S, Jain M, Krishnamurthy S, Balki A, Kodgule R, Tandon M Lung India. 2023; 39(6):517-524.
PMID: 36629230 PMC: 9746267. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_136_22.
LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.
Miravitlles M, Kawayama T, Dreher M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(22).
PMID: 36431099 PMC: 9692772. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226623.