» Articles » PMID: 30321999

Improving Pallet Mover Safety in the Manufacturing Industry: A Bow-Tie Analysis of Accident Scenarios

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 Oct 17
PMID 30321999
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A Belgian manufacturing company uses pallet movers for internal transport. Despite the company's efforts to improve occupational safety, accidents with pallet movers remain noteworthy. In order to control occupational accidents, it is crucial to have a clear view of the potential accident scenarios that are present in a company. The bow-tie method is a way to capture and visualize these accident processes in an integrative way. Included in the bow-tie are safety barriers (both technical as organizational and human) and management delivery systems that can intervene in these accident processes. Once bow-ties are composed, they are an excellent point of departure to assign indicators to the safety barriers and management delivery systems in order to control (i.e., prevent or mitigate) accident scenarios. Two types of indicators can be distinguished. Firstly, there are general indicators that are assigned to management delivery systems interrupting multiple accident scenarios, which can yield a higher safety gain (as they intervene in multiple accident scenarios). Secondly, there are scenario-specific indicators targeting one specific accident scenario, which can be valuable as they target a specific problem in the company. For the development of the bow-ties, a multi-method design with the inclusion of different data sources was used, leading to a comprehensive overview. This makes the bow-tie analysis of internal transport with pallet movers transferable to other settings where pallet movers are used for internal transport.

Citing Articles

Measuring Safety Culture Using an Integrative Approach: The Development of a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework and an Applied Safety Culture Assessment Instrument.

van Nunen K, Reniers G, Ponnet K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36294182 PMC: 9602973. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013602.


Integrating Risk Assessment and Decision-Making Methods in Analyzing the Dynamics of COVID-19 Epidemics in Davao City, Mindanao Island, Philippines.

Logrosa G, Mata M, Lachica Z, Estana L, Hassall M Risk Anal. 2021; 42(1):105-125.

PMID: 34269475 PMC: 8447332. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13779.


Analysis of a Historical Accident in a Spanish Coal Mine.

Sanmiquel-Pera L, Bascompta M, Anticoi H Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19).

PMID: 31561606 PMC: 6801938. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193615.


Special Issue of the Manufacturing Engineering Society (MES).

Rubio E, Camacho A Materials (Basel). 2018; 11(11).

PMID: 30384493 PMC: 6266078. DOI: 10.3390/ma11112149.

References
1.
Mack K, Haslegrave C, Gray M . Usability of manual handling aids for transporting materials. Appl Ergon. 1995; 26(5):353-64. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00056-9. View

2.
de Dianous V, Fievez C . ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J Hazard Mater. 2005; 130(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010. View

3.
HADDON Jr W . A note concerning accident theory and research with special reference to motor vehicle accidents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963; 107:635-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb13307.x. View

4.
Lifschultz B, Donoghue E . Deaths due to forklift truck accidents. Forensic Sci Int. 1994; 65(2):121-34. DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90267-4. View

5.
Horberry T, Larsson T, Johnston I, Lambert J . Forklift safety, traffic engineering and intelligent transport systems: a case study. Appl Ergon. 2004; 35(6):575-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.05.004. View