» Articles » PMID: 30321314

Impact of Next-generation Sequencing Defined Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pretreatment Drug Resistance on Virological Outcomes in the ANRS 12249 Treatment-as-Prevention Trial

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2018 Oct 16
PMID 30321314
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Previous studies in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals on thymidine analogue backbone antiretroviral therapy (ART) with either nevirapine or efavirenz have suggested poorer virological outcomes in the presence of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR). We assessed the impact of PDR on virological suppression (VS; <50 copies/mL) in individuals prescribed primarily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz in rural KwaZulu-Natal within a treatment-as-prevention trial.

Methods: Among 1557 HIV-positive individuals who reported no prior ART at study entry and provided plasma samples, 1328 individuals with entry viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL had next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the HIV pol gene with MiSeq technology. Results were obtained for 1148 individuals, and the presence of PDR was assessed at 5% and 20% detection thresholds. Virological outcome was assessed using Cox regression in 837 of 920 ART initiators with at least 1 follow-up VL after ART initiation.

Results: PDR prevalence was 9.5% (109/1148) and 12.8% (147/1148) at 20% and 5% thresholds, respectively. After a median of 1.36 years (interquartile range, 0.91-2.13), mostly on fixed-dose combination tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz, presence of both nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor PDR vs no PDR was associated with longer time to VS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.86), while there was no difference between those with only NNRTI PDR vs no PDR (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82-1.34) at the 5% threshold. Similar differences were observed for mutations detected at the 20% threshold, although without statistical significance.

Conclusions: NGS uncovered a high prevalence of PDR among participants enrolled in trial clinics in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Dual-class PDR to a mainly tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz regimen was associated with poorer VS. However, there was no impact of NNRTI PDR alone.

Clinical Trials Tegistration: NCT01509508; South African National Clinical Trials Register: DOH-27-0512-3974.

Citing Articles

Genetic Diversity and Antiretroviral Resistance in HIV-1-Infected Patients Newly Diagnosed in Cabo Verde.

Leal S, Pimentel V, Goncalves P, Monteiro de Pina Araujo I, Parreira R, Taveira N Viruses. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39772259 PMC: 11680417. DOI: 10.3390/v16121953.


Archived HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations: Role of Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotype for the Management of Virological Responder People Living with HIV.

Campagna R, Nonne C, Antonelli G, Turriziani O Viruses. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39599811 PMC: 11599110. DOI: 10.3390/v16111697.


HIV-1 subtype-specific drug resistance on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: protocol for a multicentre study (DTG RESIST).

Egger M, Sauermann M, Loosli T, Hossmann S, Riedo S, Beerenwinkel N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e085819.

PMID: 39174068 PMC: 11340720. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085819.


Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance Mutations Detected in Women Prior to Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz + Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate + Lamivudine (or Emtricitabine).

Boyce C, Sils T, Milne R, Wallner J, Hardy S, Ko D Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(7):ofae383.

PMID: 39050228 PMC: 11267229. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae383.


Performance of the Applied Biosystems HIV-1 Genotyping Kit with Integrase.

Moore H, Palumbo P, Notarte K, Fogel J, Cummings V, Gamble T J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62(6):e0013624.

PMID: 38727213 PMC: 11237527. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00136-24.


References
1.
Lapointe H, Dong W, Lee G, Bangsberg D, Martin J, Mocello A . HIV drug resistance testing by high-multiplex "wide" sequencing on the MiSeq instrument. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59(11):6824-33. PMC: 4604392. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01490-15. View

2.
Venter W, Kaiser B, Pillay Y, Conradie F, Gomez G, Clayden P . Cutting the cost of South African antiretroviral therapy using newer, safer drugs. S Afr Med J. 2017; 107(1):28-30. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v107.i1.12058. View

3.
Steegen K, Carmona S, Bronze M, Papathanasopoulos M, van Zyl G, Goedhals D . Moderate Levels of Pre-Treatment HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Detected in the First South African National Survey. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0166305. PMC: 5132262. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166305. View

4.
Tang M, Kanki P, Shafer R . A review of the virological efficacy of the 4 World Health Organization-recommended tenofovir-containing regimens for initial HIV therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54(6):862-75. PMC: 3284210. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir1034. View

5.
Bennett D, Camacho R, Otelea D, Kuritzkes D, Fleury H, Kiuchi M . Drug resistance mutations for surveillance of transmitted HIV-1 drug-resistance: 2009 update. PLoS One. 2009; 4(3):e4724. PMC: 2648874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004724. View