Highly Innovative Drug Program in the Czech Republic: Description and Pharmacoeconomic Results-Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Highly innovative drugs (HIDs) can be granted 2 to 3 years of temporary reimbursement (TR) to provide timely patient access and to collect real-world evidence through registries in the Czech Republic. A TR applicant does not need to comply with cost-effectiveness (CE) requirements and the willingness-to-pay threshold. It is only when mandatory transition to permanent reimbursement (PR) status occurs does the drug need to comply with CE and willingness-to-pay requirements.
Objectives: To describe and evaluate the HID program in the Czech Republic by analyzing the pharmacoeconomic results when a drug starts with TR status and transitions to PR status.
Methods: The study was a retrospective analysis of reimbursement decisions of HIDs. All drugs approved for TR (valid from January 2008 to January 2018) were identified. A description of the HIDs and their pharmacoeconomic results were analyzed.
Results: Fifty TR drugs were identified. Most (68%) were oncology drugs and 44% were orphan drugs. After the expiration of their TR status, 83% were successfully transitioned to PR status. Cost-utility analysis was used to support CE results in 42% of the TR drugs. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost/quality-adjusted life-year) of drugs that entered TR status was €97,868. When the time came for transition to PR status, the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €34,086 (lower by 65%). Net budget impact increased by 3% and decreased by 25% in the first and fifth years, respectively, after applying for PR.
Conclusions: This analysis provides better insight into the HID program for costly innovative drugs over a 10-year follow-up. A successful transition to PR status was observed for most of the HIDs (83%).
Systematic Literature Review of Access Pathways to Drugs for Patients with Rare Diseases.
Vargas C, De Abreu Lourenco R, Espinoza M, Goodall S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024; 23(2):209-229.
PMID: 39731657 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00939-4.
Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt.
Fasseeh A, Korra N, Elezbawy B, Sedrak A, Gamal M, Eldessouki R J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2024; 99(1):12.
PMID: 38825614 PMC: 11144683. DOI: 10.1186/s42506-024-00159-7.
Novel approach to decision making for orphan drugs.
Decker B, Mlcoch T, Pustovalova A, Dolezal T Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023; 39(1):e10.
PMID: 36748356 PMC: 11569974. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462323000053.