» Articles » PMID: 30315327

Derotational Osteotomy at the Distal Femur is Effective to Treat Patients with Patellar Instability

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Oct 14
PMID 30315327
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Increased femoral antetorsion influences patellofemoral joint kinematics. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome after derotational osteotomies and combined procedures in patients with patellofemoral instability.

Methods: All patients with derotational osteotomies and combined procedures in patients with patellofemoral instability and increased femoral antetorsion performed between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria were open growth plates, posttraumatic deformities, and a follow-up period less than 12 months. Simple radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cartilage lesions, trochlear dysplasia, tubercle distance, and osseous malalignment as frontal axis and torsion were performed on every patient. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the subjective IKDC evaluation form, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity score.

Results: Out of 222 femoral osteotomies, a total of 42 patients (44 knees) met the inclusion criteria. Mean preoperative femoral antetorsion of 31° (SD ± 9°) and mean valgus malalignment of 1° (SD ± 3°) were observed. An intended derotation of 12° (SD ± 5°) was set overall. The additional procedures included correction of valgus in 50% (n = 22), MPFL reconstruction in 64% (n = 28), patellofemoral arthroplasty in 18% (n = 8), trochleoplasty in 14% (n = 6), tibial tubercle transfer in 14% (n = 6). During the mean follow-up period of 44 months (SD ± 27, range 12-88), a total of five patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in a follow-up rate of 89% (n = 39). A significant pain relief from VAS 4 (SD ± 3) to VAS 2 (SD ± 2) (p = 0.006) as well as improved scores, WOMAC: from 80 (SD ± 14) to 88 (SD ± 16) (p = 0.007), Lysholm: from 46 (SD ± 21) to 71 (SD ± 24) (p < 0.001), IKDC: from 54 (SD ± 13) to 65 (SD ± 17) (p < 0.001), were observed postoperatively. During the follow-up period, no patellar re-dislocation was observed.

Conclusion: Combined derotational osteotomy is a suitable treatment for patellar instability due to torsional malformity, as it leads to a significant reduction of pain, and a significant increase of knee function with good-to- excellent results in the short-term follow-up.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Citing Articles

Distal femoral osteotomy for the treatment of chronic patellofemoral instability improves gait patterns.

Rab P, Vieider R, Fritsch L, Cotic M, Imhoff F, Siebenlist S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):176.

PMID: 40056196 PMC: 11890233. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-025-05788-x.


Derotational osteotomy is a relevant procedure in the management of lateral patellar dislocation: An expert survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group.

Wierer G, Milinkovic D, Seitlinger G, Liebensteiner M, Post W, Winkler P J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70116.

PMID: 39949711 PMC: 11821726. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70116.


The efficacy of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with distal femoral varus osteotomy in recurrent patellar dislocation and genu valgum.

Arias Perez R, Jaramillo Quiceno G, Sarmiento Riveros P Musculoskelet Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 39890771 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-024-00878-2.


Small changes of femoral torsion in varus or valgus distal femoral osteotomy using patient-specific instruments.

Jud L, Neopoulos G, Hodel S, Vlachopoulos L, Fucentese S Int Orthop. 2025; 49(3):621-627.

PMID: 39875640 PMC: 11889048. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-025-06415-5.


Derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields better outcomes in patellar subluxation with proximal femoral torsion compared with distal femoral torsion: A retrospective comparative study.

Jia Y, Bao H, Hou J, Sun R, Wang Z, Jiang J J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):640.

PMID: 39380005 PMC: 11462965. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05123-x.


References
1.
Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J . Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 10(5):697-706. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00525.x. View

2.
Post W, Teitge R, Amis A . Patellofemoral malalignment: looking beyond the viewbox. Clin Sports Med. 2002; 21(3):521-46, x. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5919(02)00011-x. View

3.
Fucentese S, von Roll A, Koch P, Epari D, Fuchs B, Schottle P . The patella morphology in trochlear dysplasia--a comparative MRI study. Knee. 2006; 13(2):145-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.12.005. View

4.
Schottle P, Romero J, Schmeling A, Weiler A . Technical note: anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a free gracilis autograft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 128(5):479-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0300-4. View

5.
Schottle P, Hensler D, Imhoff A . Anatomical double-bundle MPFL reconstruction with an aperture fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 18(2):147-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0868-z. View