» Articles » PMID: 30312717

A Prospective Phase 2 Trial of Transperineal Ultrasound-Guided Brachytherapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After External Beam Radiation Therapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG-0526)

Abstract

Purpose: Only retrospective data are available for low-dose-rate (LDR) salvage prostate brachytherapy for local recurrence after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The primary objective of this prospective phase 2 trial (NCT00450411) was to evaluate late gastrointestinal and genitourinary adverse events (AEs) after salvage LDR brachytherapy.

Methods And Materials: Eligible patients had low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer before EBRT and biopsy-proven recurrence >30 months after EBRT, with prostate-specific antigen levels <10 ng/mL and no regional/distant disease. The primary endpoint was grade 3 or higher late treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary AEs occurring 9 to 24 months after brachytherapy. These AEs were projected to be ≤10%, with ≥20% considered unacceptable. All events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Multivariate analyses investigated associations of pretreatment or treatment variables with AEs.

Results: One hundred patients from 20 centers were registered from May 2007 to January 2014. The 92 analyzable patients had a median follow-up of 54 months (range, 4-97) and a median age of 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65-74). The initial Gleason score was 7 in 48% of patients. The median dose of EBRT was 74 Gy (IQR, 70-76) at a median interval of 85 months previously (IQR, 60-119). Only 16% had androgen deprivation at study entry. Twelve patients (14%) had late grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary AEs, with no treatment-related grade 4 or 5 AEs. No pretreatment variable predicted late AEs, including prior EBRT dose and elapsed interval. Higher V100 (percentage of prostate enclosed by prescription isodose) predicted both occurrence of late AEs (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.52; P = .03) and earlier time to first occurrence (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34; P = .02).

Conclusions: This prospective multicenter trial reports outcomes of salvage LDR brachytherapy for post-EBRT recurrence. The rate of late grade 3 AEs did not exceed the unacceptable threshold. The only factor predictive of late AEs was implant dosimetry reflected by V100. Efficacy outcomes will be reported at a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

Citing Articles

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Decision Regret After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radiotherapy or Focal Therapy.

Falkenbach F, Hagemann J, Ambrosini F, Karakiewicz P, Tian Z, Nagaraj Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941765 PMC: 11815922. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030396.


Management strategies for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Rahman S, Kim H, Webb L, Diaz G, Leapman M, Sprenkle P Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(11):6473-6488.

PMID: 39697737 PMC: 11651831. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-245.


Systematic review and recommendations for re-irradiation for intraprostatic radiorecurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy.

Saripalli A, Venkatesulu B, Nickols N, Valle L, Harkenrider M, Kishan A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):520.

PMID: 39264453 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05205-9.


Salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive irradiation.

Meraouna Y, Blanchard P, Losa S, Labib A, Krhili S, Pommier P Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 48:100809.

PMID: 39027689 PMC: 11254530. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100809.


Acute toxicity outcomes from salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior radiotherapy.

Fang B, McGeachy P, Husain S, Meyer T, Thind K, Martell K J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2024; 16(2):111-120.

PMID: 38808210 PMC: 11129646. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2024.139278.


References
1.
Lee W, Dignam J, Amin M, Bruner D, Low D, Swanson G . Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(20):2325-32. PMC: 4981980. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0448. View

2.
Dragomir A, Dinea D, Vanhuyse M, Cury F, Aprikian A . Drug costs in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:252. PMC: 4099156. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-252. View

3.
Michalski J, Winter K, Roach M, Markoe A, Sandler H, Ryu J . Clinical outcome of patients treated with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83(3):e363-70. PMC: 3361689. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.070. View

4.
Morigi J, Stricker P, van Leeuwen P, Tang R, Ho B, Nguyen Q . Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(8):1185-90. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160382. View

5.
Pucar D, Hricak H, Shukla-Dave A, Kuroiwa K, Drobnjak M, Eastham J . Clinically significant prostate cancer local recurrence after radiation therapy occurs at the site of primary tumor: magnetic resonance imaging and step-section pathology evidence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.065. View