» Articles » PMID: 30307614

Sunscreen Applied at ≥ 2 Mg Cm During a Sunny Holiday Prevents Erythema, a Biomarker of Ultraviolet Radiation-induced DNA Damage and Suppression of Acquired Immunity

Overview
Journal Br J Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2018 Oct 12
PMID 30307614
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sun protection factor (SPF) is assessed with sunscreen applied at 2 mg cm . People typically apply around 0·8 mg cm and use sunscreen daily for holidays. Such use results in erythema, which is a risk factor for skin cancer.

Objectives: To determine (i) whether typical sunscreen use resulted in erythema, epidermal DNA damage and photoimmunosuppression during a sunny holiday, (ii) whether optimal sunscreen use inhibited erythema and (iii) whether erythema is a biomarker for photoimmunosuppression in a laboratory study.

Methods: Holidaymakers (n = 22) spent a week in Tenerife (very high ultraviolet index) using their own sunscreens without instruction (typical sunscreen use). Others (n = 40) were given SPF 15 sunscreens with instructions on how to achieve the labelled SPF (sunscreen intervention). Personal ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure was monitored electronically as the standard erythemal dose (SED) and erythema was quantified. Epidermal cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) were determined by immunostaining, and immunosuppression was assessed by contact hypersensitivity (CHS) response.

Results: There was no difference between personal UVR exposure in the typical sunscreen use and sunscreen intervention groups (P = 0·08). The former had daily erythema on five UVR-exposed body sites, increased CPDs (P < 0·001) and complete CHS suppression (20 of 22). In comparison, erythema was virtually absent (P < 0·001) when sunscreens were used at ≥ 2 mg cm . A laboratory study showed that 3 SED from three very different spectra suppressed CHS by around ~50%.

Conclusions: Optimal sunscreen use prevents erythema during a sunny holiday. Erythema predicts suppression of CHS (implying a shared action spectrum). Given that erythema and CPDs share action spectra, the data strongly suggest that optimal sunscreen use will also reduce CPD formation and UVR-induced immunosuppression.

Citing Articles

A novel online survey approach designed to measure consumer sunscreen application thickness-implications for estimating environmental emissions.

Carrao A, Coleman 2nd J, Guo J, Kumari H J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2023; 34(6):1064-1071.

PMID: 37898625 PMC: 11618062. DOI: 10.1038/s41370-023-00608-z.


Review on photoprotection: a clinician's guide to the ingredients, characteristics, adverse effects, and disease-specific benefits of chemical and physical sunscreen compounds.

McDonald K, Lytvyn Y, Mufti A, Chan A, Rosen C Arch Dermatol Res. 2022; 315(4):735-749.

PMID: 36443500 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02483-4.


Innovative digital solution supporting sun protection and vitamin D synthesis by using satellite-based monitoring of solar radiation.

Young A, Schalka S, Temple R, Simeone E, Sohn M, Kohlmann C Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022; 21(11):1853-1868.

PMID: 35870076 DOI: 10.1007/s43630-022-00263-7.


Laboratory testing of sunscreens on the US market finds lower in vitro SPF values than on labels and even less UVA protection.

Andrews D, Rauhe K, Burns C, Spilman E, Temkin A, Perrone-Gray S Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2021; 38(3):224-232.

PMID: 34601762 PMC: 9298345. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12738.


Effects of Sex and Seasonal Climatic Changes on the Risk of Incidence of Anti-EGFR Therapy-Induced Rash in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Arai T, Fujita Y, Imai H, Matsumoto H, Yamazaki M, Hiruta E Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(8).

PMID: 34441007 PMC: 8401647. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57080801.