Impact of Video Aid on Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy

Overview

Journal Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialty Gastroenterology

Date 2018 Oct 12

PMID 30305797

Authors

Sanna Fatima

Deepanshu Jain

Christopher Hibbard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effect of video aid on quality of bowel preparation.

Study: A retrospective study was done on patients undergoing outpatient screening colonoscopy. All subjects received educational video prior to colonoscopy in addition to the standard counseling. Patient charts were reviewed to collect data regarding quality of bowel preparation (adequate or inadequate). The study population was stratified into four groups according to viewing status: Group I 0% (control group), Group II <50%, Group III >50% to <75%, and Group IV watched ⩾75% of the video.

Results: A total of 338 patients with an average age of 59.1 years and 60.3% females were included in the final study cohort. Of the patients in Groups I, II, III, and IV, 94.3%, 90.9%, 100%, and 91.7%, respectively, had adequate preparation ( value = .827). Adenoma detection rate (ADR) for Groups I, II, III, and IV was 28.8%, 50%, 50%, and 22.6%, respectively ( value = .305). The mean cecal intubation time was 20.7, 16.4, 16.57, and 17 minutes for Groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively ( value = .041).

Conclusions: Video aid use for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy lacked a statistically significant impact on the quality of bowel preparation, ADR, and advanced adenoma detection rate when compared with standard practice.

References

Seeff L, Richards T, Shapiro J, Nadel M, Manninen D, Given L . How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(6):1670-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.051. View

Veldhuijzen G, Klemt-Kropp M, Noomen C, Van Esch A, Tjwa E, Drenth J . Computer-assisted instruction before colonoscopy is as effective as nurse counselling, a clinical pilot trial. Endosc Int Open. 2017; 5(8):E792-E797. PMC: 5546893. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110813. View

Ness R, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N . Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(6):1797-802. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x. View

Garg S, Girotra M, Chandra L, Verma V, Kaur S, Allawy A . Improved Bowel Preparation with Multimedia Education in a Predominantly African-American Population: A Randomized Study. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2016; 2016:2072401. PMC: 4781963. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2072401. View

Park J, Kim M, Kim H, Kim S, Shin C, Lee H . A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016; 16(1):64. PMC: 4912707. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0476-6. View

Wu K, Rayner C, Chuah S, Chiu K, Lu C, Chiu Y . Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 54(1):107-12. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb1e52. View

Tae J, Lee J, Hong S, Han J, Lee Y, Chung J . Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76(4):804-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.026. View

Calderwood A, Lai E, Fix O, Jacobson B . An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of a simple visual aid to improve bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 73(2):307-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.013. View

Hayat U, Lee P, Lopez R, Vargo J, Rizk M . Online Educational Video Improves Bowel Preparation and Reduces the Need for Repeat Colonoscopy Within Three Years. Am J Med. 2016; 129(11):1219.e1-1219.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.011. View

10.

Kilgore T, Abdinoor A, Szary N, Schowengerdt S, Yust J, Choudhary A . Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(6):1240-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.007. View

11.

Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, Pagano N, Spada C, Carrara S . A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10(5):501-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.12.037. View

12.

Burke C, Church J . Enhancing the quality of colonoscopy: the importance of bowel purgatives. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66(3):565-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1084. View

13.

Hong S, Sung I, Kim J, Choe W, Kim B, Ko S . The Effect of the Bowel Preparation Status on the Risk of Missing Polyp and Adenoma during Screening Colonoscopy: A Tandem Colonoscopic Study. Clin Endosc. 2012; 45(4):404-11. PMC: 3521943. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.4.404. View

14.

Verma S, Fogel J, Beyda D, Bernstein B, Notar-Francesco V, Mohanty S . Chronic methadone use, poor bowel visualization and failed colonoscopy: a preliminary study. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(32):4350-6. PMC: 3436050. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4350. View

15.

Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M, Rosenbaum A, Wang T, Neugut A . The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(6):1207-14. PMC: 3106145. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.051. View

16.

Hendry P, Jenkins J, Diament R . The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(8):745-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01220.x. View